The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and Women
Open accessAbstract
The relation between arterial function indices, such as pulse wave velocity and augmentation index with parameters derived from input impedance analysis, is still incompletely understood. Carotid pressure, central flow waveforms, and pulse wave velocity were noninvasively acquired in 2026 apparently healthy, middle-aged subjects (1052 women and 974 men) 35 to 55 years old at inclusion. Input and characteristic impedance, reflection coefficient, the ratio of backward-to-forward pressure amplitude (reflection magnitude), and augmentation index were derived. Pulse wave velocity increased by 15% (from 6.1 to 7.0 m/s) both in men and women. In qualitative terms, input impedance evolved from a pattern indicative of wave transmission and reflection to a pattern more compatible with a windkessel-like system. In women, a decrease in total arterial compliance led to an increased input impedance in the low frequency range, whereas few changes were observed in men. Characteristic impedance did not change with age in women and even decreased in men ( P <0.001) and could not be identified as the primary determinant of central pulse pressure. Augmentation index increased with age, as was expected, and was systematically higher in women ( P <0.001). Reflection coefficient and reflection magnitude increased with age ( P <0.001) without gender differences. We conclude that, in healthy middle-aged subjects, the age-related increase in arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity) is not fully paralleled by an increase in arterial impedance, suggesting a role for age-dependent modulation of aortic cross-sectional area. Wave reflection increases with age and is not higher in women than in men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mitchell, G. F. (2008) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90549.2008 · Cited by 764
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Self-citationTime domain analysis of the arterial pulse in clinical medicine
O’Rourke, M. F. (2009) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0370-7 · Cited by 79
Clinical achievements of impedance analysis
Mitchell, G. F. (2009) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0402-3 · Cited by 63
Measurements of arterial pressure and flow in vivo
Sharman, J. E., Segers, P., & Chirinos, J. A. (2022) · Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91391-1.00002-9 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Segers, P., Rietzschel, E. R., De Buyzere, M. L., Vermeersch, S. J., De Bacquer, D., Van Bortel, L. M., De Backer, G., Gillebert, T. C., & Verdonck, P. R.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1248-1255
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2121881071
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.106.085480
- The paper
- Segers, P., Rietzschel, E. R., De Buyzere, M. L., Vermeersch, S. J., De Bacquer, D., Van Bortel, L. M., De Backer, G., Gillebert, T. C., & Verdonck, P. R. (2007). Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and Women. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.106.085480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.