Mercury Exposure and Risk of Hypertension in US Men and Women in 2 Prospective Cohorts
Open accessAbstract
Cross-sectional studies and animal experiments suggest that methylmercury exposure could increase the risk of hypertension. This relationship has not been evaluated in large prospective studies. Using data from previous nested case-control studies in 2 separate prospective cohorts, we measured toenail mercury, a valid biomarker of long-term methylmercury exposure, among 6045 US men and women free of hypertension at baseline. Geometric mean toenail mercury concentrations were 0.08 μg/g in the lowest quintile and 0.74 μg/g in the highest quintile, the latter corresponding with exposures ≈2.0-fold higher than the US Environmental Protection Agency reference dose. Participants were followed prospectively (mean±SD follow-up, 14.9±7.9 years) for a new self-report of physician-diagnosed hypertension (3540 cases), shown to be >95% sensitive and specific for diagnosing hypertension in these cohorts as compared with review of medical charts and direct blood pressure measurement, respectively. After adjustment for demographic, clinical, and lifestyle risk factors, the hazard ratio (95% CI) for incident hypertension in the highest versus lowest quintile of mercury exposure was 0.96 (0.84–1.09) in women, 0.82 (0.62–1.08) in men, and 0.94 (0.84–1.06) in both cohorts combined. Findings were similar when more extreme categories of mercury were compared (across deciles, with geometric mean levels in highest decile ≈2.9-fold higher than the reference dose) and in analyses stratified by fish or omega-3 consumption, selenium levels, body mass index, and age. These findings from 2 separate large prospective cohort studies do not support any clinically apparent adverse effects of methylmercury exposure on the risk of hypertension in men or women, including at levels ≤2.5-fold higher than the reference dose.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methylmercury consumed from fish has no detectable influence on incident cardiovascular events, hypertension, or diabetes.
“Methylmercury consumed from fish has no detectable influence on incident cardiovascular events, hypertension, or diabetes.216-218”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [217]
Methylmercury consumed from fish has no detectable influence on incident cardiovascular events, hypertension, or diabetes.
“Methylmercury consumed from fish has no detectable influence on incident cardiovascular events, hypertension, or diabetes.216-218”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [218]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Mozaffarian, D., Shi, P., Morris, J. S., Grandjean, P., Siscovick, D. S., Spiegelman, D., Willett, W. C., Rimm, E. B., Curhan, G. C., & Forman, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 645-652
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- PMC
- PMC3466587
- OpenAlex
- W2097707646
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r01es014433-01a2)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL035464, HL35464, HL-088521, HL34594, R01HL034594, R01HL088521)
- National Cancer Institute (CA-87969, CA-55075, P01CA087969, P01CA055075)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01-ES014433)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- methylmercury exposure, sex differences, fish consumption, omega-3 fatty acids, selenium, body mass index, incident hypertension risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Environmental Exposure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Mercury, Methylmercury Compounds, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Seafood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review