Cited by 80Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments

Health-Related Quality of Life After Renal Denervation in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Hypertension

Lambert, Gavin W., Hering, Dagmara, Esler, Murray D., Marusic, Petra, Lambert, Elisabeth A., Tanamas, Stephanie K., Shaw, Jonathan, Krum, Henry +3 more·2012·Hypertension

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of the renal sympathetic nerves in reducing blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension. The effect of renal denervation on health-related quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated. Using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Beck Depression Inventory-II, we examined QoL before and 3 months after renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled BP. For baseline comparisons, matched data were extracted from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle database. Before renal denervation, patients with resistant hypertension (n=62) scored significantly worse in 5 of the eight 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey domains and the Mental Component Summary score. Three months after denervation (n=40), clinic BP was reduced (change in systolic and diastolic BP, −16±4 and −6±2 mm Hg, respectively; P <0.01). The Mental Component Summary score improved (47.6±1.1 versus 52±1; P =0.001) as a result of increases in the vitality, social function, role emotion, and mental health domains. Beck Depression Inventory scores were also improved, particularly with regard to symptoms of sadness ( P =0.01), tiredness ( P <0.001), and libido ( P <0.01). The magnitude of BP reduction or BP level achieved at 3 months bore no association to the change in QoL. Renal denervation was without a detrimental effect on any elements of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. These results indicate that patients with severe hypertension resistant to therapy present with a marked reduction in subjective QoL. In this pre- and post-hypothesis generating study, several aspects of QoL were improved after renal denervation; however, this was not directly associated with the magnitude of BP reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.200865

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several open-label trials have documented the efficacy of renal denervation in subjects with resistant hypertension many of whom are obese.

    “Several open-label trials have documented the efficacy of renal denervation in subjects with resistant hypertension many of whom are obese (24–28).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 80

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smithwick RH, Thompson JE. Splanchnicectomy for essential hyperten- sion; results in 1,266 cases. JAMA. 1953;152:1501-1504.

Authors
Lambert, G. W., Hering, D., Esler, M. D., Marusic, P., Lambert, E. A., Tanamas, S. K., Shaw, J., Krum, H., Dixon, J. B., Barton, D. A., & Schlaich, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • From the Human Neurotransmitters (G.W.L., M.D.E., E.A.L., J.B.D.), Neurovascular Hypertension and Kidney Disease (D.H., P.M., M.P.S.), and Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology Laboratories (S.K.T., J.S.), Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (G.W.L., M.D.E., J.S., M.P.S.), Department of Physiology (E.A.L.), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (J.S., H.K.), and Department of General Practice (J.B.D.),...
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2012-12
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
1479-1484
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2126507517
Cited by
80
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (KOLUMB/2010-1)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Keywords
renal denervation, treatment-resistant hypertension, health-related quality of life, radiofrequency ablation, renal sympathetic nerves, blood pressure reduction, depression, mental health, quality of life domains
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Depression, Emotions, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Behavior, Sympathectomy, Sympathetic Nervous System, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review