Health-Related Quality of Life After Renal Denervation in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Hypertension
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of the renal sympathetic nerves in reducing blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension. The effect of renal denervation on health-related quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated. Using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Beck Depression Inventory-II, we examined QoL before and 3 months after renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled BP. For baseline comparisons, matched data were extracted from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle database. Before renal denervation, patients with resistant hypertension (n=62) scored significantly worse in 5 of the eight 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey domains and the Mental Component Summary score. Three months after denervation (n=40), clinic BP was reduced (change in systolic and diastolic BP, −16±4 and −6±2 mm Hg, respectively; P <0.01). The Mental Component Summary score improved (47.6±1.1 versus 52±1; P =0.001) as a result of increases in the vitality, social function, role emotion, and mental health domains. Beck Depression Inventory scores were also improved, particularly with regard to symptoms of sadness ( P =0.01), tiredness ( P <0.001), and libido ( P <0.01). The magnitude of BP reduction or BP level achieved at 3 months bore no association to the change in QoL. Renal denervation was without a detrimental effect on any elements of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. These results indicate that patients with severe hypertension resistant to therapy present with a marked reduction in subjective QoL. In this pre- and post-hypothesis generating study, several aspects of QoL were improved after renal denervation; however, this was not directly associated with the magnitude of BP reduction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several open-label trials have documented the efficacy of renal denervation in subjects with resistant hypertension many of whom are obese.
“Several open-label trials have documented the efficacy of renal denervation in subjects with resistant hypertension many of whom are obese (24–28).”
From Obesity-Associated Hypertension: Recent Progress in Deciphering the Pathogenesis (2014) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 80
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Smithwick RH, Thompson JE. Splanchnicectomy for essential hyperten- sion; results in 1,266 cases. JAMA. 1953;152:1501-1504.
- Authors
- Lambert, G. W., Hering, D., Esler, M. D., Marusic, P., Lambert, E. A., Tanamas, S. K., Shaw, J., Krum, H., Dixon, J. B., Barton, D. A., & Schlaich, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- From the Human Neurotransmitters (G.W.L., M.D.E., E.A.L., J.B.D.), Neurovascular Hypertension and Kidney Disease (D.H., P.M., M.P.S.), and Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology Laboratories (S.K.T., J.S.), Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (G.W.L., M.D.E., J.S., M.P.S.), Department of Physiology (E.A.L.), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (J.S., H.K.), and Department of General Practice (J.B.D.),...
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1479-1484
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2126507517
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (KOLUMB/2010-1)
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
- Keywords
- renal denervation, treatment-resistant hypertension, health-related quality of life, radiofrequency ablation, renal sympathetic nerves, blood pressure reduction, depression, mental health, quality of life domains
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Pressure, Depression, Emotions, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Behavior, Sympathectomy, Sympathetic Nervous System, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review