Autonomic Blockade Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Obese Subjects
Open accessAbstract
Obesity is an important risk factor for the development of insulin resistance. Initial compensatory mechanisms include an increase in insulin levels, which are thought to induce sympathetic activation in an attempt to restore energy balance. We have previously shown, however, that sympathetic activity has no beneficial effect on resting energy expenditure in obesity. On the contrary, we hypothesize that sympathetic activation contributes to insulin resistance. To test this hypothesis, we determined insulin sensitivity using a standard hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp protocol in obese subjects randomly assigned in a crossover design 1 month apart to receive saline (intact day) or trimetaphan (4 mg/min IV, autonomic blocked day). Whole-body glucose uptake (MBW in mg/kg per minute) was used as index of maximal muscle glucose use. During autonomic blockade, we clamped blood pressure with a concomitant titrated intravenous infusion of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N-monomethyl-L-arginine. Of the 21 obese subjects (43±2 years; 35±2 kg/m 2 body mass index) studied, 14 were insulin resistant; they were more obese, had higher plasma glucose and insulin, and had higher muscle sympathetic nerve activity (23.3±1.5 versus 17.2±2.1 burst/min;P=0.03) when compared with insulin-sensitive subjects. Glucose use improved during autonomic blockade in insulin-resistant subjects (MBW 3.8±0.3 blocked versus 3.1±0.3 mg/kg per minute intact;P=0.025), with no effect in the insulin-sensitive group. These findings support the concept that sympathetic activation contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and may result in a feedback loop whereby the compensatory increase in insulin levels contributes to greater sympathetic activation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ganglionic blockade improves insulin-glucose metabolism in obese insulin resistant subjects with elevated baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity but not in obese insulin sensitive subjects.
“Recently, Gamboa et al87 expanded on this discovery by demonstrating that ganglionic blockade improved insulin-glucose metabolism in obese insulin resistant subjects with elevated baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity but not in obese insulin sensitive subjects.”
From The Sympathetic Nervous System Alterations in Human Hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Gamboa, A., Okamoto, L. E., Arnold, A. C., Figueroa, R. A., Diedrich, A., Raj, S. R., Paranjape, S. Y., Farley, G., Abumrad, N., & Biaggioni, I.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-874
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- PMC
- PMC4162826
- OpenAlex
- W2136038391
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Vanderbilt University
- Clinical Trial Center, China Medical University Hospital
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000445)
- Vanderbilt Diabetes Research and Training Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL095905, P01HL056693)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007569)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 020593, R01DK091748, DK 20593, P30DK020593)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS065736)
- NIH Clinical Center
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- obesity, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, autonomic blockade, trimetaphan, sympathetic nervous system, muscle glucose uptake, whole-body glucose uptake, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, L-NMMA, nitric oxide synthase inhibition, compensatory insulin secretion, energy balance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Ganglionic Blockers, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles, Obesity, Trimethaphan, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cross-Over Studies, Nitric Oxide Synthase, omega-N-Methylarginine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review