Ethnic differences in associations between blood pressure and stroke in south Asian and European men
Open accessAbstract
It is unknown whether associations between blood pressure (BP) and stroke vary between Europeans and South Asians, despite higher stroke rates in the latter. We report findings from a UK cohort study of 1375 European and 1074 South Asian men, not receiving antihypertensive medication, aged 40 to 69 years at baseline (1988–1991). Assessment included BP, blood tests, anthropometry, and questionnaires. Incident stroke was established at 20 years from death certification, hospital and primary care records, and participant report. South Asians had higher systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure than Europeans, and similar pulse pressure. Associations between systolic BP or diastolic BP and stroke were stronger in South Asians than Europeans, after adjustment for age, smoking status, waist/hip ratio, total/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio, diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, physical activity, and heart rate (systolic BP: Europeans [odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–1.51], South Asians [1.56; 1.24–1.95]; ethnic difference P =0.04; diastolic BP: Europeans [0.90; 0.71–1.13], South Asians [1.68; 1.32–2.15]; P <0.001). Hemodynamic correlates of stroke risk differed by ethnicity: in combined models, mean arterial pressure but not pulse pressure was detrimentally associated with stroke in South Asians, whereas the converse was true for Europeans. The combination of hyperglycemia and hypertension appeared particularly detrimental for South Asians. There are marked ethnic differences in associations between BP parameters and stroke. Undue focus on systolic BP for risk prediction, and current age and treatment thresholds may be inappropriate for individuals of South Asian ancestry.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Risk factor effects for dementia may vary between ethnic groups.
“and risk factors effect for dementia may vary between ethnic groups.(46, 47)”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
The Abstract reports that associations between blood pressure and stroke differed between South Asian and European men. This supports the general idea that a risk factor’s association with an outcome may vary by ethnicity, but the paper studies stroke, not dementia; it does not establish the claim for dementia. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe effect of high blood pressure on the risk of stroke is greater in minority ethnic groups in the UK compared to the White British population.
“cardiovascular disease research has found that the effect of, for example, high BP effect on the risk of stroke is greater in minority ethnic groups in the UK compared to the White British population”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
The Discussion reports stronger associations between blood pressure and stroke risk in South Asians than Europeans. However, the study examined UK South Asian and European men, not minority ethnic groups generally or a specifically White British comparison group. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Eastwood, S. V., Tillin, T., Chaturvedi, N., & Hughes, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 481-488
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- PMC
- PMC4632186
- OpenAlex
- W2100313222
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (082464)
- British Heart Foundation (PG/08/103/26133, CS/13/1/30327, SP/07/001/23603)
- University College London
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- blood pressure, stroke, ethnic differences, South Asians, Europeans, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, hyperglycemia, stroke risk prediction, men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Incidence, Stroke, White People, Asian People, Waist-Hip Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review