The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: An International Expert Position Paper
Open accessAbstract
Telemedicine allows the remote exchange of medical data between patients and healthcare professionals. It is used to increase patients’ access to care and provide effective healthcare services at a distance. During the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telemedicine has thrived and emerged worldwide as an indispensable resource to improve the management of isolated patients due to lockdown or shielding, including those with hypertension. The best proposed healthcare model for telemedicine in hypertension management should include remote monitoring and transmission of vital signs (notably blood pressure) and medication adherence plus education on lifestyle and risk factors, with video consultation as an option. The use of mixed automated feedback services with supervision of a multidisciplinary clinical team (physician, nurse, or pharmacist) is the ideal approach. The indications include screening for suspected hypertension, management of older adults, medically underserved people, high-risk hypertensive patients, patients with multiple diseases, and those isolated due to pandemics or national emergencies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The potential importance of HBPT has been further emphasized by the difficulties in managing patients, including those with hypertension, at the time of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak [119]”
In the citing paper
“and to achieve more satisfactory hypertension control rates [57,112–115]”
Citations
Cites
Forouzanfar, M. H., Afshin, A., Alexander, L. T., Anderson, H. R., Bhutta, Z. A., Biryukov, S., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Cercy, K., Charlson, F. J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31679-8 · Cited by 7,698
Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19
Hollander, J. E., & Carr, B. G. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2003539 · Cited by 2,970
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019)
Umemura, S., Arima, H., Arima, S., Asayama, K., Dohi, Y., Hirooka, Y., Horio, T., Hoshide, S., Ikeda, S., Ishimitsu, T., et al. (2019) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9 · Cited by 1,880
Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review
Scott Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16674087 · Cited by 1,735
2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines
Unger, T., Borghi, C., Charchar, F., Khan, N. A., Poulter, N. R., Prabhakaran, D., Ramirez, A., Schlaich, M., Stergiou, G. S., Tomaszewski, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002453 · Cited by 1,283
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000596 · Cited by 1,127
Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution
Keesara, S., Jonas, A., & Schulman, K. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2005835 · Cited by 1,126
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D., Coca, A., De Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001961 · Cited by 882
Self-citationVideo consultations for covid-19
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., & Morrison, C. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m998 · Cited by 866 · cited 1×
“The recent pandemic has strongly promoted the use of remote monitoring and televisits, where in-person consulting has been greatly reduced or impossible.(86,87) In the next paragraphs, we present the experience collected in the countries of the experts involved in the development of the position paper during the COVID…”
BackgroundGeldsetzer, P., Manne-Goehler, J., Marcus, M.-E., Ebert, C., Zhumadilov, Z., Wesseh, C. S., Tsabedze, L., Supiyev, A., Sturua, L., Bahendeka, S. K., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30955-9 · Cited by 860
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC). Telehealth Accreditation. 2020 https://www.urac.org/programs/telehealth-accreditation. Accessed June 29 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–306 of 306
Telemonitoring in the era of digital hypertension: beyond remote blood pressure monitoring
Tomitani, N., & Kario, K. (2026) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-026-02827-x
Self-citationMyinga, G. G., & Kajirunga, A. (2026) · International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science · doi:10.18535/ijecs.v15i10.5737
Ota, Y., Kuwabara, M., & Kario, K. (2026) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-026-02838-8
Self-citationImplementing a Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program at Rural Resident Primary Care Clinic.
Acharya, S., Jun, S.-H., Bhattarai, S., Regmi, K., Mohammad, T., Elzinga, E., Arif, M., Heera, J., Berlin, M., & Pokharel, Y. (2026) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1097/jmq.0000000000000355
Al‐Akash, H. Y., Sawalha, M., Alshammari, A. J. N., Rawas, H. O., AbuRuz, M. E., Saleh, Z. T., Alkouri, O. A., Al‐Yateem, N., Ahmed, A. M., & Saifan, A. A. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14203409
Liu, J., Gong, X., Yang, T., Xu, R., Tan, L., & Ye, H. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001779
Metadata
- Authors
- Omboni, S., McManus, R. J., Bosworth, H. B., Chappell, L. C., Green, B. B., Kario, K., Logan, A. G., Magid, D. J., Mckinstry, B., Margolis, K. L., Parati, G., & Wakefield, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Sechenov University (RU)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Duke University (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- Jichi Medical University (JP)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Colorado Permanente Medical Group (US)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- HealthPartners (US)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- University of Missouri (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1368-1383
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W3086532707
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 45
- FWCI
- 33.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK6 HX003161)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200201, NIHR-RP-02-12-015, RP-2014-05-019)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- telemedicine, hypertension, remote blood pressure monitoring, medication adherence, lifestyle education, video consultation, COVID-19 pandemic, hypertension screening, older adults, medically underserved populations, high-risk hypertensive patients, multidisciplinary care, automated feedback
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Blood Pressure Determination, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Italy, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Severity of Illness Index, Occupational Health, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management, Pandemics, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review