Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Trends and Future Directions

Open access
Teraa, Martin, Conte, Michael S., Moll, Frans L., Verhaar, Marianne C.·2016·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

C ritical limb ischemia (CLI), which is at the end of the peripheral artery disease (PAD) spectrum, is associated with excessively high risk for cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, and death.[1][2][3] Mortality rates as high as 20% within 6 months from diagnosis and exceeding 50% at 5 years have been reported for CLI, 4-6 whereas 1-year mortality rates in nonrevascularizable, so-called no-option CLI patients range from 10% to 40%.7,8 The high mortality rates exceed those for every other form of occlusive cardiovascular disease, including symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), 9,10 and reflect the systemic atherosclerotic burden associated with CLI.Besides poor survival rates, prognosis with respect to limb preservation in CLI patients is poor, 11 particularly in no-option CLI patients, where 6-month major amputation rates have been reported to range from 10% to 40%.[6][7][8] Additionally, CLI is associated with poor quality of life 12 and high treatment costs, 13 especially when amputation is inevitable.13,14 With an estimated yearly incidence of 500 to 1000 new cases per million individuals in Western society, 7 which is ever increasing in concert with the increase in cardiovascular risk factors, 15-17 CLI poses a substantial burden on patients, healthcare providers, and resources.In the current review we will describe how management strategies in CLI have evolved over the past decades and discuss issues that could facilitate more rapid and evidencebased improvements in CLI management and care.Focus will be on factors that may have limited evidence-based management and on actions that could promote progress in this field, especially with respect to clinical research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.115.002938

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Teraa, M., Conte, M. S., Moll, F. L., & Verhaar, M. C.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2016-02-23
Volume
5
Issue
2
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2279728460
Cited by
256
References
81
FWCI
29.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Trends and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/jaha.115.002938
The paper
Teraa, M., Conte, M. S., Moll, F. L., & Verhaar, M. C. (2016). Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.002938

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.