Increased Muscle Mass Protects Against Hypertension and Renal Injury in Obesity
Open accessAbstract
Background: Obesity compromises cardiometabolic function and is associated with hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Exercise ameliorates these conditions, even without weight loss. Although the mechanisms of exercise's benefits remain unclear, augmented lean body mass is a suspected mechanism. Myostatin is a potent negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass that is upregulated in obesity and downregulated with exercise. The current study tested the hypothesis that deletion of myostatin would increase muscle mass and reduce blood pressure and kidney injury in obesity. Methods and Results: Myostatin knockout mice were crossed to db/db mice, and metabolic and cardiovascular functions were examined. Deletion of myostatin increased skeletal muscle mass by ≈50% to 60% without concomitant weight loss or reduction in fat mass. Increased blood pressure in obesity was prevented by the deletion of myostatin, but did not confer additional benefit against salt loading. Kidney injury was evident because of increased albuminuria, which was abolished in obese mice lacking myostatin. Glycosuria, total urine volume, and whole kidney NOX‐4 levels were increased in obesity and prevented by myostatin deletion, arguing that increased muscle mass provides a multipronged defense against renal dysfunction in obese mice. Conclusions: These experimental observations suggest that loss of muscle mass is a novel risk factor in obesity‐derived cardiovascular dysfunction. Interventions that increase muscle mass, either through exercise or pharmacologically, may help limit cardiovascular disease in obese individuals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one animal study involving myostatin knockout mice, relative muscle mass increased by 53.8-59.5%.
“HbA1c was reported in only one study involving myostatin knockout mice, which demonstrated a relative increase in muscle mass of 53.8–59.5% and a corresponding HbA1c reduction of 2.2–21.8% [61].”
From Effects of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy on Fat Mass and Glucose Homeostasis in Humans and Animals: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search (2025) · cites this paper as [61]
The Methods and Results passage reports that myostatin deletion increased skeletal muscle mass by approximately 50–60%, and the Results report increases in both lean and obese mice. That supports the stated magnitude, but our copy does not give the precise endpoints of 53.8% and 59.5%. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn that myostatin knockout mouse study, HbA1c was reduced by 2.2-21.8%.
“HbA1c was reported in only one study involving myostatin knockout mice, which demonstrated a relative increase in muscle mass of 53.8–59.5% and a corresponding HbA1c reduction of 2.2–21.8% [61].”
From Effects of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy on Fat Mass and Glucose Homeostasis in Humans and Animals: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search (2025) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Butcher, J. T., Mintz, J. D., Larion, S., Qiu, S., Ruan, L., Fulton, D. J., & Stepp, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Augusta University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stepp, David W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- e009358-e009358
- ISSN
- 2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6201396
- OpenAlex
- W2892127723
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL124773, R01HL125926)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- myostatin, obesity, hypertension, kidney injury, skeletal muscle mass, lean body mass, db/db mice, albuminuria, glycosuria, NOX4, salt loading, physical activity, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- NADPH Oxidase 4, Animals, Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Glycosuria, Renal, Hypertension, Kidney, Mice, Obese, Obesity, Risk Factors, Sodium Chloride, Dietary, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Mice, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Myostatin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review