Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐Sensitivity Troponin I in Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network

Fudim, Marat, Ambrosy, Andrew P., Sun, Jie‐Lena, Anstrom, Kevin J., Bart, Bradley A., Butler, Javed, AbouEzzeddine, Omar, Greene, Stephen J., Mentz, Robert J., Redfield, Margaret M., Reddy, Yogesh N.V., Vaduganathan, Muthiah, Braunwald, Eugene, Hernandez, Adrian F., Borlaug, Barry A., Felker, G. Michael·2018·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: We sought to study the prevalence of high‐sensitivity troponin and its association with cardiac structure and outcomes in ambulatory and hospitalized patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction ( HF p EF ). Methods and Results: A post hoc analysis utilized data from HF p EF patients: DOSE (Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation) and CARRESS ‐ HF (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) enrolled patients hospitalized with acute HF p EF , and RELAX (Phosphodiesterase‐5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) enrolled ambulatory patients with HF p EF . High‐sensitivity troponin I (hs‐TnI) was measured in hospitalized patients at baseline, at 72 to 96 hours, on day 7, and on day 60. In ambulatory patients hs‐TnI was measured at baseline and at week 24. In the ambulatory cohort, correlations between hs‐TnI and cardiac structure and function were assessed. The association between hs‐TnI and a 60‐day composite of emergency room visits, readmissions, and death was assessed for hospitalized patients using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. The study population included 139 hospitalized and 212 ambulatory patients with HF p EF and hs‐TnI measured at baseline. The median (25th, 75th percentiles) baseline troponin was 17.6 (11.1, 41.0) ng/L in hospitalized patients and 9.5 (5.3, 19.7) ng/L in ambulatory patients ( P <0.001). The prevalence of elevated hs‐TnI (>99% percentile upper reference limit was 86% in hospitalized patients and 53% among ambulatory patients, with stable elevation in ambulatory patients during follow‐up. HF p EF patients with a hs‐TnI above the median were older with worse left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction. Continuously valued hs‐TnI (per doubling) was associated with increased risk of composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.00‐1.43; P =0.042). Conclusions: Hs‐TnI is commonly elevated among both hospitalized and ambulatory patients with HF p EF . Increased hs‐TnI levels are associated with worse cardiac structure and increased risk of adverse events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.118.010364

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with HFpEF frequently display chronic low-grade myocardial injury as reflected by elevated levels of troponin, and this degree of myocardial injury is correlated with severity of cardiac dysfunction, hemodynamic congestion, impairment in functional capacity and risk for HF hospitalization.

    “Patients with HFpEF also frequently display chronic low-grade myocardial injury as reflected by elevated levels of troponin13,14, and like albuminuria, this degree of myocardial injury in HFpEF is correlated with the severity of cardiac dysfunction, hemodynamic congestion, impairment in functional capacity and risk for HF hospitalization13,14.”

    From Effects of tirzepatide on circulatory overload and end-organ damage in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a secondary analysis of the SUMMIT trial (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Circulating troponin levels are commonly elevated in HFpEF, where they are associated with greater risk for HF hospitalization or death.

    “Circulating troponin levels are commonly elevated in HFpEF, where they are associated with greater risk for HF hospitalization or death14.”

    From Effects of tirzepatide on circulatory overload and end-organ damage in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a secondary analysis of the SUMMIT trial (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Conclusions report that high-sensitivity troponin I was elevated in a large majority of hospitalized HFpEF patients and more than half of ambulatory patients. The Results (Outcomes in Initially Hospitalized HFpEF; page not provided) associate higher levels with a 60-day composite of emergency-room visits, readmissions, and death. That supports an association with adverse outcomes, but the paper does not establish a separate association with HF hospitalization or death, and it assessed clinical outcomes only in the initially hospitalized cohort. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.016 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.961581 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706824 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs110 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ejhf.341 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655076 · DOI
  7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.080770 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.064 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1005419 · DOI
  14. 10.1056/NEJMoa1210357 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.12.009 · DOI
  16. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.821785 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/jama.2013.2024 · DOI
  18. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.969071 · DOI
  19. 10.1515/cclm-2017-0350 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01447-4 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/jhm.2558 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031560 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/ejhf.911 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001427 · DOI
  25. 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.17 · DOI
  26. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4726 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021884 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.10.010 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002562 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.930701 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.586 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.029 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.537 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60595-4 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025505 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/jama.2010.1708 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.039 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy564.P884 · DOI
  39. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084543.79097.34 · DOI
  40. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.044149 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fudim, M., Ambrosy, A. P., Sun, J., Anstrom, K. J., Bart, B. A., Butler, J., AbouEzzeddine, O., Greene, S. J., Mentz, R. J., Redfield, M. M., Reddy, Y. N. V., Vaduganathan, M., Braunwald, E., Hernandez, A. F., Borlaug, B. A., & Felker, G. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2018-12-18
Volume
7
Issue
24
ISSN
2047-9980
Cited by
25
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review