Understanding Readmissions in Medicare Beneficiaries during the 90-Day Follow-up Period of an Acute Myocardial Infarction Admission
Open accessAbstract
Background: Medicare has a voluntary episodic payment model for Medicare beneficiaries that bundles payment for the index acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ) hospitalization and all post‐discharge services for a 90‐day follow‐up period. The purpose of this study is to report on the types and frequency of readmissions and identify demographic and clinical factors associated with readmission of Medicare beneficiaries that survived their AMI hospitalization. Methods and Results: This retrospective study used the Inpatient Standard Analytical File for 2014. There were 143 286 Medicare beneficiaries with AMI who were discharged alive from 3619 hospitals. All readmissions occurring in any hospital within 90 days of the index AMI discharge date were identified. Of 143 286 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive from their index AMI hospitalization, 28% (40 145) experienced at least 1 readmission within 90 days and 8% (11 477) had >1 readmission. Readmission rates were higher among Medicare beneficiaries who did not undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention in their index AMI admission (34%) compared with those that underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (20.2%). Using all Medicare beneficiary's index AMI , 27 comorbid conditions were significantly associated with the likelihood of a Medicare beneficiary having a readmission during the follow‐up period. The strongest clinical characteristics associated with readmissions were dialysis dependence, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure. Conclusions: This study provides benchmark information on the types of hospital readmissions Medicare beneficiaries experience during a 90‐day AMI bundle. This paper also suggests that interventions are needed to alleviate the need for readmissions in high‐risk populations, such as, those managed medically and those at risk of heart failure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 3-month timeframe is clinically and operationally significant as the hospital's diabetes case manager follows up on discharged patients during this period, frequently identified as the high-risk period in the literature.
“The 3-month timeframe is clinically and operationally significant as the hospital’s diabetes case manager follows up on discharged patients during this period, frequently identified as the high-risk period in the literature [39–41].”
From Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
The Discussion (page not provided) reports readmissions within 90 days after acute myocardial infarction and identifies both type 1 and type 2 diabetes as predictors of readmission. That supports concern about risk during a three-month follow-up period, but the study concerns Medicare beneficiaries discharged after a heart attack; it does not establish the entire three months as a high-risk period for discharged diabetes patients generally. The hospital’s case-manager practice is context supplied by the citing authors, not a finding of this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [2]White HD, Chew DP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2008; 372: 570– 584. 18707987
- [3]Dunlay SM, Pack QR, Thomas RJ, Killian JM, Roger VL. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2014; 127: 538– 546. 24556195 PMC4035431
- [4]Brown JR, Chang CH, Zhou W, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ, Goodman DC. Health system characteristics and rates of readmission after acute myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3: e000714 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000714. 24847032 PMC4309053 · DOI
- [5]Joynt KE, Jha AK. A path forward on Medicare readmissions. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1175– 1177. 23465069
- [6]Bernheim SM, Grady JN, Lin Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Savage SV, Han LF, Bhat KR, Ross JS, Desai MM, Merril AR, Han LF, Rapp MT, Drye EE, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. National patterns of risk‐standardized mortality and readmission for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 459– 467. 20736442 PMC3027304
- [7]Krumholz HM, Merrill AR, Schone EM, Schreiner GC, Chen J, Bradley EH, Wang Y, Wang Y, Lin Z, Straube BM, Rapp MT. Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30‐day mortality and readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2: 407– 413. 20031870
- [8]Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee‐for‐service program. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1418– 1428. 19339721
- [9]McManus DD, Saczynski JS, Lessard D, Waring ME, Allison J, Parish DC, Goldberg RJ, Ash A, Kiefe CI; TRACE‐CORE Investigators. Reliability of predicting early hospital readmission after discharge for an acute coronary syndrome using claims‐based data. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117: 501– 507. 26718235 PMC4768305
- [10]Ranasinghe I, Wang Y, Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM. Readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia among young and middle‐aged adults: a retrospective observational cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014; 11: e1001737. 25268126 PMC4181962
- [11]Southern DA, Ngo J, Martin BJ, Galbraith PD, Knudtson ML, Ghali WA, James MT, Wilton SB. Characterizing types of readmission after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization: implications for quality reporting. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3: e001046 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001046. 25237046 PMC4323836 · DOI
- [12]Dunlay SM, Weston SA, Killian JM, Bell MR, Jaffe AS, Roger VL. Thirty‐day rehospitalizations after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 11– 17. 22751756 PMC3524992
- [13]Krumholz HM, Lin Z, Keenan PS, Chen J, Ross JS, Drye EE, Bernheim SM, Wang Y, Bradley EA, Han LF, Normand SLT. Relationship between hospital readmission and mortality rates for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. JAMA. 2013; 309: 587– 593. 23403683 PMC3621028
- [14]Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Lin Z, Bueno H, Ross JS, Horwitz LI, Barreto‐Filho JA, Kim N, Bemheim SM, Suter LG, Drye EE, Krumholz HM. Diagnoses and timing of 30‐day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. JAMA. 2013; 309: 355– 363. 23340637 PMC3688083
- [15]Kociol RD, Lopes RD, Clare R, Thomas L, Mehta RH, Kaul P, Granger CB. International variation in and factors associated with hospital readmission after myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2012; 307: 66– 74. 22215167
- [16]Krumholz HM, Lin Z, Drye EE, Desai MM, Han LF, Rapp MT, Normand SLT. An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30‐day all‐cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4: 243– 252. 21406673 PMC3350811
- [17]Desai MM, Stauffer BD, Feringa HH, Schreiner GC. Statistical models and patient predictors of readmission for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2: 500– 507. 20031883
- [18]Martin LM, Januzzi JL, Thompson RW, Ferris TG, Singh JP, Bhambhani V, Wasfy JH. Clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction patients included in the hospital readmissions reduction program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7: e009339 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009339. 30369306 PMC6201407 · DOI
- [19]Kim LK, Yeo I, Cheung JW, Swaminathan RV, Wong SC, Charitakis K, Adejumo O, Chae J, Minutello RM, Bergman G, Singh H, Feldman DN. Thirty‐day readmission rates, timing, causes, and costs after ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: a national readmission database analysis 2010–2014. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7: e009863 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009863. 30371187 PMC6222940 · DOI
- [20]O'Brian C, Valsdottir L, Wasfy JH, Strom JB, Secemsky EA, Wang Y, Yeh RW. Comparison of 30‐day readmission rates after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction in men versus women. Am J Cardiol. 2017; 120: 1070– 1076. 28781023
- [21]Kini V, Peterson PN, Spertus JA, Kenndy KF, Arnold SV, Wasfy JH, Curtis JP, Bradley SM, Amin AP, Ho PM, Masoudi FA. Clinical model to predict 90‐day risk readmission after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11: e004788. 30354578 PMC6214661
- [22]Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, DiSesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr, Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, Lange RA, London MJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC, Winniford MD. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011; 124: e652– e735. 22064599
- [23]Levine GN, O'Gara PT, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Baily SR, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Diercks DB, Ellis SG, Fang JC, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Krumholz HM, Lange RA, Linderbaum JA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Morrow DA, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis‐Holland JE, Ting HH, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2016; 133: 1135– 1147. 26490017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S.-Y., Saleem, M., Land, A. M., DeLaney, E. W., Garretson, A. R., Patel, M., Hall, A. G., Westrick, S., Ovalle, F., Cherrington, A. L., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106604
- Authors
- Culler, S. D., Kugelmass, A. D., Cohen, D. J., Reynolds, M. R., Katz, M. R., Brown, P. P., Schlosser, M. L., & Simon, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Baystate Health (US)
- Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
- Baim Institute for Clinical Research (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- HealthTrust Purchasing Group LLP Nashville TN
- AWS Research, LLC Indianapolis IN
- Corresponding author
- Culler, Steven D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Published
- 2019-11-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- e013513-e013513
- ISSN
- 2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6898831
- OpenAlex
- W2982398747
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Keywords
- acute myocardial infarction, hospital readmission, Medicare beneficiaries, percutaneous coronary intervention, comorbidities, heart failure, dialysis dependence, type 1 diabetes, risk factors for readmission
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review