Cited by 29Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Sodium‐Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, All‐Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Bayesian Meta‐Analysis and Meta‐Regression

Open access
Odutayo, Ayodele, da Costa, Bruno R., Pereira, Tiago V., Garg, Vinay, Iskander, Samir, Roble, Fatimah, Lalji, Rahim, Hincapié, Cesar A. +10 more·2021·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in reducing the incidence of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods and Results: We conducted a Bayesian meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with placebo. We used meta‐regression to examine the association between treatment effects and control group event rates as measures of cardiovascular baseline risk. Fifty‐three randomized controlled trials were included in our synthesis. Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduced the incidence of all‐cause mortality (empagliflozin: rate ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.63–0.97; canagliflozin: RR, 0.86; 95% CrI, 0.69–1.05; dapagliflozin: RR, 0.86; 95% CrI, 0.72–1.01) and cardiovascular mortality (empagliflozin: RR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.61–1.00; canagliflozin: RR, 0.83; 95% CrI, 0.63–1.05; dapagliflozin: RR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.71–1.08), with a 90.1% to 98.7% probability for the true RR to be <1.00 for both outcomes. There was little evidence for ertugliflozin and sotagliflozin versus placebo for reducing all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. There was no association between treatment effects for all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality and the control group event rates. There was evidence for a reduction in the incidence of heart failure for empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and ertugliflozin versus placebo (probability RR <1.00 of ≥99.3%) and weaker, albeit positive, evidence for acute myocardial infarction for the first 3 agents (probability RR <1.00 of 89.0%–95.2%). There was little evidence of any agent except canagliflozin for reducing the incidence of stroke. Conclusions: Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduced the incidence of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality versus placebo. Treatment effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus placebo do not vary by baseline risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.120.019918

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SGLT2i and GLP1ra are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.

    “Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra) are novel classes of medications for type 2 diabetes that significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia and are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.4–11”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says current guidelines recommend SGLT-2 inhibitors for adults with established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk, and cites a European guideline recommending them for secondary prevention. It does not address guideline endorsement of GLP-1 receptor agonists, so it supports only the SGLT2i part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SGLT2i and GLP1ra significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia.

    “Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra) are novel classes of medications for type 2 diabetes that significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia and are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.4–11”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results (All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality; page unavailable) report evidence of reduced cardiovascular mortality for three SGLT2 inhibitors, but little evidence for two others. The paper does not establish that the mortality benefit is independent of glucose lowering, and it does not evaluate GLP-1 receptor agonists. Its Discussion addresses guideline recommendations for SGLT2 inhibitors, not both drug classes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 29

Authors
Odutayo, A., da Costa, B. R., Pereira, T. V., Garg, V., Iskander, S., Roble, F., Lalji, R., Hincapié, C. A., Akingbade, A., Rodrigues, M., Agarwal, A., Lawendy, B., Saadat, P., Udell, J. A., Cosentino, F., Grant, P. J., Verma, S., & Jüni, P.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC) Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s HospitalUniversity of Toronto Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Jüni, Peter
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2021-09-21
Volume
10
Issue
18
Pages
e019918-e019918
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199553988
Cited by
29
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, ertugliflozin, sotagliflozin, cardiovascular risk, meta-regression
MeSH terms
Canagliflozin, Bayes Theorem, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Humans, Sodium, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review