The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
B leeding R isk A nalysis in S troke I maging Before Thrombo L ysis (BRASIL): Pooled Analysis of T2*-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data From 570 Patients
Abstract
Background and Purpose— There has been speculation that the risk of secondary symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) may be increased after thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke patients who have cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Because of this concern, some centers withhold potentially beneficial thrombolytic therapy from these patients. Methods— We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging data acquired within 6 hours after symptom onset from 570 ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in 13 centers in Europe, North America, and Asia. Baseline T2*-weighted magnetic resonance images were evaluated for the presence of CMBs. The primary end point was SICH, defined as clinical deterioration with an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score by ≥4 points, temporally related to a parenchymal hematoma on follow-up-imaging. Results— A total of 242 CMBs were detected in 86 of 570 patients (15.1%). The number of CMBs ranged from 1 to 77 in the individual patient, with ≥5 CMBs in 6 of 570 patients (1.1%). Proportions of patients with SICH were 5.8% (95% CI, 1.9 to 13.0) in the presence of CMBs and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.5) in patients without CMBs ( P =0.170, Fisher’s exact test), resulting in no significant absolute increase in the risk of SICH of 3.1% (95% CI, −2.0 to 8.3). Conclusions— The data suggest that if there is any increased risk of SICH attributable to CMBs, it is likely to be small and unlikely to exceed the benefits of thrombolytic therapy. No reliable conclusion regarding risk in the rare patient with multiple CMBs can be reached.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jeerakathil, T., Wolf, P. A., Beiser, A., Hald, J. K., Au, R., Kase, C. S., Massaro, J. M., & DeCarli, C. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000131809.35202.1b · Cited by 319
Cited by
Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation
Greenberg, S. M., Vernooij, M. W., Cordonnier, C., Viswanathan, A., Al-Shahi Salman, R., Warach, S., Launer, L. J., Van Buchem, M. A., & Breteler, M. M. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70013-4 · Cited by 1,798
Demaerschalk, B. M., Kleindorfer, D. O., Adeoye, O. M., Demchuk, A. M., Fugate, J. E., Grotta, J. C., Khalessi, A. A., Levy, E. I., Palesch, Y. Y., Prabhakaran, S., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000086 · Cited by 670
Smith, E. E., Saposnik, G., Biessels, G. J., Doubal, F. N., Fornage, M., Gorelick, P. B., Greenberg, S. M., Higashida, R. T., Kasner, S. E., & Seshadri, S. (2017) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000116 · Cited by 404
Merino, J. G., & Warach, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiehler, J., Albers, G. W., Boulanger, J.-M., Derex, L., Gass, A., Hjort, N., Kim, J. S., Liebeskind, D. S., Neumann-Haefelin, T., Pedraza, S., Rother, J., Rothwell, P., Rovira, A., Schellinger, P. D., & Trenkler, J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2738-2744
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2105186939
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.