Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 861

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sequential-Design, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early Decompressive Craniectomy in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction (DECIMAL Trial)

Vahedi, Katayoun, Vicaut, Eric, Mateo, Joaquim, Kurtz, Annie, Orabi, Mikael, Guichard, Jean-Pierre, Boutron, Carole, Couvreur, Gregory, Rouanet, François, Touzé, Emmanuel, Guillon, Benoît, Carpentier, Alexandre, Yelnik, Alain, George, Bernard, Payen, Didier, Bousser, Marie-Germaine·2007·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— There is no effective medical treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of early decompressive craniectomy in patients with malignant MCA infarction. Methods— We conducted in France a multicenter, randomized trial involving patients between 18 and 55 years of age with malignant MCA infarction to compare functional outcomes with or without decompressive craniectomy. A sequential, single-blind, triangular design was used to compare the rate of development of moderate disability (modified Rankin scale score ≤3) at 6 months’ follow-up (primary outcome) between the 2 treatment groups. Results— After randomization of 38 patients, the data safety monitoring committee recommended stopping the trial because of slow recruitment and organizing a pooled analysis of individual data from this trial and the 2 other ongoing European trials of decompressive craniectomy in malignant MCA infarction. Among the 38 patients randomized, the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score ≤3 at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up was 25% and 50%, respectively, in the surgery group compared with 5.6% and 22.2%, respectively, in the no-surgery group ( P =0.18 and P =0.10, respectively). There was a 52.8% absolute reduction of death after craniectomy compared with medical therapy only ( P <0.0001). Conclusions— In this trial, early decompressive craniectomy increased by more than half the number of patients with moderate disability and very significantly reduced (by more than half) the mortality rate compared with that after medical therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.107.485235

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 861

Metadata

Authors
Vahedi, K., Vicaut, E., Mateo, J., Kurtz, A., Orabi, M., Guichard, J.-P., Boutron, C., Couvreur, G., Rouanet, F., Touzé, E., Guillon, B., Carpentier, A., Yelnik, A., George, B., Payen, D., & Bousser, M.-G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2007-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
2506-2517
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2137512130
Cited by
861
References
0
FWCI
18.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequential-Design, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early Decompressive Craniectomy in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction (DECIMAL Trial). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.107.485235
The paper
Vahedi, K., Vicaut, E., Mateo, J., Kurtz, A., Orabi, M., Guichard, J.-P., Boutron, C., Couvreur, G., Rouanet, F., Touzé, E., Guillon, B., Carpentier, A., Yelnik, A., George, B., Payen, D., & Bousser, M.-G. (2007). Sequential-Design, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early Decompressive Craniectomy in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.485235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.