Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of Functional Outcome in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The FUNC Score

Rost, Natalia S., Smith, Eric E., Chang, Yuchiao, Snider, Ryan W., Chanderraj, Rishi, Schwab, Kristin, FitzMaurice, Emily, Wendell, Lauren, Goldstein, Joshua N., Greenberg, Steven M., Rosand, Jonathan·2008·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most fatal and disabling stroke subtype. Widely used tools for prediction of mortality are fundamentally limited in that they do not account for effects of withdrawal of care and are not designed to predict functional recovery. We developed an acute clinical score to predict likelihood of functional independence. Methods— We prospectively characterized 629 consecutive patients with ICH at hospital presentation. Predictors of functional independence (Glasgow Outcome Score ≥4) at 90 days were used to develop a logistic regression-based risk stratification scale in a random subset of two thirds and validated in the remaining one third of the cohort. Results— At 90 days, 162 (26%) patients achieved independence. Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, ICH location, volume (all P <0.0001), and pre-ICH cognitive impairment ( P =0.005) were independently associated with Glasgow Outcome Score ≥4. The FUNC score was developed as a sum of individual points (0–11) based on strength of association with outcome. In both the development and validation cohorts, the proportion of patients who achieved Glasgow Outcome Score ≥4 increased steadily with FUNC score. No patient assigned a FUNC score ≤4 achieved functional independence, whereas >80% with a score of 11 did. The predictive accuracy of the FUNC score remained unchanged when restricted to ICH survivors only, consistent with absence of confounding by early withdrawal of care. Conclusions— FUNC score is a valid clinical assessment tool that identifies patients with ICH who will attain functional independence and thus, can provide guidance in clinical decision-making and patient selection for clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.107.512202

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Rost, N. S., Smith, E. E., Chang, Y., Snider, R. W., Chanderraj, R., Schwab, K., FitzMaurice, E., Wendell, L., Goldstein, J. N., Greenberg, S. M., & Rosand, J.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2008-08
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
2304-2309
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1976280787
Cited by
473
References
0
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Functional Outcome in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The FUNC Score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.107.512202
The paper
Rost, N. S., Smith, E. E., Chang, Y., Snider, R. W., Chanderraj, R., Schwab, K., FitzMaurice, E., Wendell, L., Goldstein, J. N., Greenberg, S. M., & Rosand, J. (2008). Prediction of Functional Outcome in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The FUNC Score. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.512202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.