Cited by 605Erythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Ehrenreich, Hannelore, Weissenborn, Karin, Prange, Hilmar, Schneider, Dietmar, Weimar, Christian, Wartenberg, Katja, Schellinger, Peter D., Bohn, Matthias +14 more·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Numerous preclinical findings and a clinical pilot study suggest that recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) provides neuroprotection that may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke. Although EPO has been considered to be a safe and well-tolerated drug over 2 decades, recent studies have identified increased thromboembolic complications and/or mortality risks on EPO administration to patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease. Accordingly, the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized German Multicenter EPO Stroke Trial (Phase II/III; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00604630) was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EPO in stroke. Methods— This clinical trial enrolled 522 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory (intent-to-treat population) with 460 patients treated as planned (per-protocol population). Within 6 hours of symptom onset, at 24 and 48 hours, EPO was infused intravenously (40 000 IU each). Systemic thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was allowed and stratified for. Results— Unexpectedly, a very high number of patients received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (63.4%). On analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, neither primary outcome Barthel Index on Day 90 ( P =0.45) nor any of the other outcome parameters showed favorable effects of EPO. There was an overall death rate of 16.4% (n=42 of 256) in the EPO and 9.0% (n=24 of 266) in the placebo group (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.38; P =0.01) without any particular mechanism of death unexpected after stroke. Conclusions— Based on analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations only, this is a negative trial that also raises safety concerns, particularly in patients receiving systemic thrombolysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.109.564872

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 605

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. O'Collins VE, Macleod MR, Donnan GA, Horky LL, van der Worp BH, Howells DW. 1026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:467-477.

Authors
Ehrenreich, H., Weissenborn, K., Prange, H., Schneider, D., Weimar, C., Wartenberg, K., Schellinger, P. D., Bohn, M., Becker, H., Wegrzyn, M., Jähnig, P., Herrmann, M., Knauth, M., Bähr, M., Heide, W., Wagner, A., Schwab, S., Reichmann, H., Schwendemann, G., Dengler, R., Kastrup, A., & Bartels, C.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • From the Division of Clinical Neuroscience (H.E., M.W., C.B.), Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany; Center for Neurological Medicine (K.W., R.D.), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Department of Neurology (H.P., M.B., A.K.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany; the Department of Neurology (D.S., A.W.), University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; the Department of Neurology (C.W.), University of Duisburg...
Corresponding author
Ehrenreich, Hannelore
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
e647-56
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2103320383
Cited by
605
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 57
FWCI
43.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
recombinant human erythropoietin, acute ischemic stroke, neuroprotection, thrombolysis, tissue plasminogen activator, middle cerebral artery infarction, mortality, stroke outcome, drug safety
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Ischemia, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Interactions, Erythropoietin, Female, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Recombinant Proteins, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Neuroprotective Agents, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Stroke, Young Adult, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review