Cited by 84Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementBarrier Structure and Function StudiesErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

Combination of tissue-plasminogen activator with erythropoietin induces blood–brain barrier permeability, extracellular matrix disaggregation and DNA fragmentation after focal cerebral ischemia in mice

Zechariah, Anil, ElAli, Ayman, Hermann, Dirk M.·2010·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— After 1 clinical study in which recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) protected against ischemic stroke and improved clinical outcome, the German multicenter EPO trial recently reported increased mortality in stroke patients receiving EPO after tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA)-induced thrombolysis. The reasons for the adverse effects of EPO in t-PA–treated patients are unknown. Methods— Mice were submitted to 90 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immediately after reperfusion, animals were treated with normal saline or t-PA (10 mg/kg). Animals subsequently received injections of normal saline or EPO that were administered after reperfusion and 12 hours later (2500 IU/kg each). Ischemic injury and brain edema were analyzed at 24 hours after reperfusion by cresyl violet staining and terminal transferase biotinylated-dUTP nick end labeling. Blood–brain barrier integrity was assessed by histochemistry for extravasated serum IgG. Matrix metalloproteinase activity was evaluated by gelatinase zymography. Results— EPO did not influence ischemic infarct size but reduced brain swelling. This effect was abolished by t-PA, which exacerbated serum IgG extravasation in ischemic tissue. Gelatinase zymographies revealed that EPO promoted matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity that was markedly elevated by t-PA. Add-on treatment with t-PA increased the density of DNA-fragmented cells in ischemic tissue of EPO-treated, but not vehicle-treated, mice. Conclusions— Our data demonstrate a hitherto unknown interaction of t-PA with EPO at the blood–brain interface, ie, promotion of vascular permeability and extracellular matrix breakdown, which may account for the unfavorable actions of EPO in t-PA–treated patients. After t-PA–induced thrombolysis, EPO may not be suitable as stroke treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.109.574418

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 84

Authors
Zechariah, A., ElAli, A., & Hermann, D. M.
Affiliations
Essen University Hospital (DE)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2010-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1008-1012
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2042613009
Cited by
84
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Keywords
tissue plasminogen activator, erythropoietin, focal cerebral ischemia, blood-brain barrier permeability, extracellular matrix degradation, MMP-9, DNA fragmentation, cerebral edema, thrombolysis, ischemic stroke treatment, middle cerebral artery occlusion
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Brain Ischemia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Erythropoietin, Extracellular Matrix, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Mice, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review