Combination of tissue-plasminogen activator with erythropoietin induces blood–brain barrier permeability, extracellular matrix disaggregation and DNA fragmentation after focal cerebral ischemia in mice
Abstract
Background and Purpose— After 1 clinical study in which recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) protected against ischemic stroke and improved clinical outcome, the German multicenter EPO trial recently reported increased mortality in stroke patients receiving EPO after tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA)-induced thrombolysis. The reasons for the adverse effects of EPO in t-PA–treated patients are unknown. Methods— Mice were submitted to 90 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immediately after reperfusion, animals were treated with normal saline or t-PA (10 mg/kg). Animals subsequently received injections of normal saline or EPO that were administered after reperfusion and 12 hours later (2500 IU/kg each). Ischemic injury and brain edema were analyzed at 24 hours after reperfusion by cresyl violet staining and terminal transferase biotinylated-dUTP nick end labeling. Blood–brain barrier integrity was assessed by histochemistry for extravasated serum IgG. Matrix metalloproteinase activity was evaluated by gelatinase zymography. Results— EPO did not influence ischemic infarct size but reduced brain swelling. This effect was abolished by t-PA, which exacerbated serum IgG extravasation in ischemic tissue. Gelatinase zymographies revealed that EPO promoted matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity that was markedly elevated by t-PA. Add-on treatment with t-PA increased the density of DNA-fragmented cells in ischemic tissue of EPO-treated, but not vehicle-treated, mice. Conclusions— Our data demonstrate a hitherto unknown interaction of t-PA with EPO at the blood–brain interface, ie, promotion of vascular permeability and extracellular matrix breakdown, which may account for the unfavorable actions of EPO in t-PA–treated patients. After t-PA–induced thrombolysis, EPO may not be suitable as stroke treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Subsequent experimental studies showed that erythropoietin activated MMP2 and 9 after focal cerebral ischaemia, an effect potentiated by alteplase, causing blood-brain barrier leakage, brain oedema, and haemorrhagic transformation.
“Subsequent experimental studies have shown that erythropoietin activated matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 after focal cerebral ischaemia, an effect that was potentiated by alteplase, thus provoking blood–brain barrier leakage, brain oedema, and haemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.91,92”
From Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation (2012) · cites this paper as [91]
Animal studies have identified medical conditions that specifically undermine neurorestorative therapies by making the brain prone to detrimental responses.
“Animal studies have identified medical conditions that specifically undermine neurorestorative therapies by making the brain prone to detrimental responses.”
From Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation (2012) · cites this paper as [91]
Such findings have been reported for severe associated systemic diseases (diabetic vasculopathy), after systemic thrombolysis, and when restorative treatments were initiated at inappropriate timepoints (before stroke).
“Such findings have been reported for severe associated systemic diseases (ie, diabetic vasculopathy),80 subsequent to systemic thrombolysis,91,92 and when restorative treat ments were initiated at inappropriate timepoints (ie, before stroke;93 table).”
From Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation (2012) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Zechariah, A., ElAli, A., & Hermann, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1008-1012
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2042613009
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Keywords
- tissue plasminogen activator, erythropoietin, focal cerebral ischemia, blood-brain barrier permeability, extracellular matrix degradation, MMP-9, DNA fragmentation, cerebral edema, thrombolysis, ischemic stroke treatment, middle cerebral artery occlusion
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Brain Ischemia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Erythropoietin, Extracellular Matrix, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Mice, DNA Fragmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review