The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose—: Collaterals sustain the penumbra before recanalization and offset infarct growth, yet the influence of baseline collateral flow on recanalization after endovascular therapy remains relatively unexplored. Methods—: We analyzed consecutive patients who received endovascular therapy for acute cerebral ischemia from 2 distinct study populations. We assessed the relationship between pretreatment collateral grade and vascular recanalization (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia [TIMI] scale). In addition, we assessed infarct growth on serial MRI. Results—: A total of 222 patients was included, 138 from the United States and 84 from South Korea. Complete revascularization occurred in 14.1% (11 of 78) patients with poor pretreatment collateral grades, whereas it was observed in 25.2% (26 of 103) patients with good collaterals and 41.5% (17 of 41) patients with excellent collaterals ( P <0.001). This relationship was consistently observed in both study populations, although the mode of endovascular therapy was different between them. After adjustment for other factors, including mode of endovascular therapy, prior use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, and site of occlusion, pretreatment collateral grade was independently associated with recanalization. When revascularization was achieved, greater infarct growth occurred in patients with poor collaterals than in those with good collaterals ( P =0.012). Conclusions—: Our data indicate that angiographic collateral grade determines the recanalization rate after endovascular revascularization therapy. When therapeutic revascularization was achieved, beneficial effects were not observed in patients with poor collaterals. Angiographic collateral grade may therefore help guide treatment decision-making in acute cerebral ischemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vascular remodeling after ischemic stroke: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials.
Liu, J., Wang, Y., Akamatsu, Y., Lee, C. C., Stetler, R. A., Lawton, M. T., & Yang, G.-Y. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.004 · Cited by 335
Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Kim, S. J., Kim, G.-M., Chung, C.-S., Ovbiagele, B., Lee, K. H., Liebeskind, D. S., & Collaborators, F. T. U.-S. S. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.604603 · Cited by 287
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Kim, S. J., Kim, G.-M., Chung, C.-S., Ovbiagele, B., Lee, K. H., & Liebeskind, D. S.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 693-699
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2013317331
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.110.595256
- The paper
- Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Kim, S. J., Kim, G.-M., Chung, C.-S., Ovbiagele, B., Lee, K. H., & Liebeskind, D. S. (2011). Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.595256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.