Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke Is Associated With Ipsilesional Primary Motor Cortical Activity: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background and Purpose—: Although neuroimaging studies have revealed specific patterns of reorganization in the sensorimotor control network after stroke, their role in recovery remains unsettled. To review the existing evidence systematically, we performed activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies investigating upper limb movement-related brain activity after stroke. Methods—: Twenty-four studies using sensorimotor tasks in standardized coordinates were included, totaling 255 patients and 145 healthy controls. Across the entire brain, we compared task-related activity patterns in good and poor recovery and assessed the magnitude of spatial shifts in sensorimotor activity in cortical motor areas after stroke. Results—: When compared with healthy controls, patients showed higher activation likelihood estimation values in contralesional primary motor soon after stroke that abated with time, but were not related to motor outcome. The observed activity changes were consistent with restoration of typical interhemispheric balance. In contrast, activation likelihood estimation values in ipsilesional medial-premotor and primary motor cortex were associated with good outcome, reorganization that may reflect vicarious processes associated with ventral activity shifts from BA4a to 4p. In the anterior cerebellum, a novel finding was the association of poor recovery with increased vermal activity, possibly reflecting behaviorally inadequate compensatory strategies engaging the fastigio-thalamo-cortical and corticoreticulospinal systems. Conclusions—: Activity in ipsilesional primary motor and medial-premotor cortices in chronic stroke signals good motor recovery, whereas cerebellar vermis activity signals poor recovery. Functional MRI may be useful in identifying recovery biomarkers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In humans, good functional recovery after stroke is associated with remapping of sensorimotor function in motor, somatosensory and premotor circuits and is accompanied by increases in cortical thickness in these reorganizing areas.
“In humans, good functional recovery after stroke is associated with remapping of sensorimotor function in motor, somatosensory and premotor circuits5,6 and is accompanied by increases in cortical thickness in these reorganizing areas7.”
From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 51 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Favre, I., Zeffiro, T. A., Detante, O., Krainik, A., Hommel, M., & Jaillard, A.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1077-1083
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2161963507
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- upper limb motor recovery, medial prefrontal cortex, sensorimotor cortex, activation likelihood estimation
- MeSH terms
- Arm, Cerebellum, Brain Ischemia, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Movement Disorders, Somatosensory Cortex, Time Factors, Recovery of Function, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review