Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Factors, Stroke Prevention Treatments, and Prevalence of Cerebral Microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Romero, José Rafael, Preis, Sarah R., Beiser, Alexa, DeCarli, Charles, Viswanathan, Anand, Martinez-Ramirez, Sergi, Kase, Carlos S., Wolf, Philip A., Seshadri, Sudha·2014·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are associated with increased risk of stroke and poor cognition. Vascular risk factors and medications used for stroke prevention may increase the risk of CMB. We examined the prevalence of CMB and the association of these risk factors with CMB, postulating that risk factors for cerebral amyloid angiopathy would be associated with lobar CMB and markers of hypertensive vasculopathy with deep CMB. Methods —: We include 1965 Framingham Original and Offspring participants (age, 66.5±11.0 years; 54% women) and evaluated the age- and sex-specific prevalence of CMB. We related various vascular and genetic (apolipoprotein E [ APOE ]) risk factors and medication use to the presence of CMB overall and stratified by brain location (deep, lobar, or mixed). Results —: CMBs were observed in 8.8% of participants, being mostly lobar (63%). CMB prevalence increased with age ( P <0.0001) and was higher in men ( P <0.001). Hypertension increased risk of any CMB, and in deep and mixed locations ( P <0.05), and low total cholesterol and APOE ε4 increased risk of lobar CMB ( P <0.05). Statin use increased risk of lobar and mixed location CMB ( P <0.05). The latter association was not affected by adjustment for cholesterol levels or concomitant medication use. Conclusions —: We observed the expected association of hypertension with deep CMB and low cholesterol and APOE ε4 with lobar CMB. In addition, statin use was independently associated with CMB risk. This potential adverse effect of statin use needs to be examined in other cohorts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004130

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Romero, J. R., Preis, S. R., Beiser, A., DeCarli, C., Viswanathan, A., Martinez-Ramirez, S., Kase, C. S., Wolf, P. A., & Seshadri, S.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2014-05
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1492-1494
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2165651751
Cited by
252
References
3
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.