The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in Functional Outcome Over the First Year After Stroke: An Observational Study From the Swedish Stroke Register
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose—: Large longitudinal studies on stroke outcome are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze predictors and changes in functional outcome during the first year poststroke. Methods—: Data on patients who were independent in activities of daily living (ADL) and hospitalized for acute stroke in 2008 to 2010 were obtained from the Swedish Stroke Register. Case fatality was assessed by linkage to the Swedish Population Register. ADL was defined by independence or dependence in dressing, toileting, and indoor mobility and assessed at 3 and 12 months. Predictors of ADL dependency were assessed through multivariate analysis. Results—: In total, 64 746 patients were included. Case fatality at 3 months was 13.1% (men 11.6% versus women 14.8%; P <0.0001) and at 12 months 18.2% (men 16.4% versus women 20.3%; P <0,0001). In the 35 064 followed-up survivors, ADL dependency rates at 3 and 12 months were 16.2% (men 15.9% versus women 19.2%; P <0.0001) and 28.3% (men 22.7% versus women 34.9%, P <0.0001), respectively. Factors predicting deterioration to ADL dependency between 3 and 12 months were female sex (relative risk [RR]=1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50–1.70), diabetes mellitus (RR=1.50; 95% CI, 1.05–1.60), comatose at admittance (RR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.79–3.05), previous stroke (RR=1.52; 95% CI, 1.43–1.61), hemorrhagic or unspecified stroke (RR=1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.25), and atrial fibrillation (RR= 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04–1.17). Conclusions—: Transition from ADL independence to dependence was observed in a high proportion of patients between 3 and 12 months, challenging the common belief that functioning after stroke is stable beyond 3 months. Deterioration occurred more commonly in women, among whom 1/6 converted to dependency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 · Cited by 3,899
Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes
Reeves, M. J., Bushnell, C. D., Howard, G., Gargano, J. W., Duncan, P. W., Lynch, G., Khatiwoda, A., & Lisabeth, L. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70193-5 · Cited by 1,362
Remarkable Decline in Ischemic Stroke Mortality is Not Matched by Changes in Incidence
Vaartjes, I., O’Flaherty, M., Capewell, S., Kappelle, J., & Bots, M. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.112.677724 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Augestad, I. L., Dekens, D., Karampatsi, D., Elabi, O., Zabala, A., Pintana, H., Larsson, M., Nyström, T., Paul, G., Darsalia, V., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.15524 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Ullberg, T., Zia, E., Petersson, J., & Norrving, B.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 389-394
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2110233361
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Functional Outcome Over the First Year After Stroke: An Observational Study From the Swedish Stroke Register. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.114.006538
- The paper
- Ullberg, T., Zia, E., Petersson, J., & Norrving, B. (2015). Changes in Functional Outcome Over the First Year After Stroke: An Observational Study From the Swedish Stroke Register. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.006538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.