The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What, Exactly, Is Wrong with Confucian Filial Morality?
Open accessAbstract
Confucianism’s emphasis on filial piety is both a hallmark of its approach to ethics and a source of concern. Critics charge that filial piety’s extreme partialism corrupts Chinese society and should therefore be expunged from the tradition. Are the critics correct? In this article, we outline the criticism and note its persistence over the last century. We then evaluate data from the empirical study of corruption to see whether they support the claim that partialism corrupts. Finally, we report some recent experimental work done with colleagues testing the claim that filial piety is associated with tolerance of corruption in Chinese societies. The results suggest that the critics are on to something. However, partialism (or kin affection) is not a cause of concern. Instead, authoritarianism (another aspect of filial piety) is associated with tolerance of corruption. We conclude that critics should reformulate their criticisms if they seek to combat corruption effectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior
MOORE, C., DETERT, J. R., KLEBE TREVIÑO, L., BAKER, V. L., & MAYER, D. M. (2012) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x · Cited by 1,159
Wealth, Culture, and Corruption
Husted, B. W. (1999) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490073 · Cited by 853
Moral identity as moral ideal self: Links to adolescent outcomes
Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Olsen, J. A., Woodbury, R. D., & Hickman, J. R. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033598 · Cited by 182
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Angle, Stephen C. 2008. No Supreme Principle: Confucianism's Harmonization of Multiple Values. Dao 7 (1): 35--40. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-008-9038-0. · DOI
- Angle, Stephen C. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Bedford, Olwen and Kuang-Hui Yeh. 2019. The History and the Future of the Psychology of Filial Piety: Chinese Norms to Contextualized Personality Construct. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 100. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100. Buchtel et al.(Unpublished manuscript- a )Buchtel, Guan, and Wang buch--a Buchtel, Emma E., Yanjun Guan, and Ning Wang. Unpublished manuscript- a. Framing Moral Character: Universal and Cultural Influences on Lay Prototypes of Moral Character in Two Chinese Cultures. Last viewed 2021. Buchtel et al.(Unpublished manuscript- b )Buchtel, Ye, Liu, Guan, and Sarkissian buch--b Buchtel, Emma E., Frank Tian-Fang Ye, Xiao-Xiao Liu, Yanjun Guan, and Hagop Sarkissian. Unpublished manuscript- b. The Particularism vs. Corruption Tolerance Scale: Are There Unique Vulnerabilities to Relational Temptations for Bending Rules? Last viewed 2022. · DOI
- Chow, Tse-Tsung. 1960. The Anti-Confucian Movement in Early Republican China. In The Confucian Persuasionḩeckcomma edited by Arthur F. Wrightḩeckcomma 288--312. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Chow, Tse-Tsung. 1960. The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual Revolution in Modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. · DOI
- Cline, Erin. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the Sense of Justice. New York: Fordham University Press. · DOI
- Davis, James H. and John A. Ruhe. 2003. Perceptions of Country Corruption: Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4): 275--288. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023038901080. Fine et al.(2016)Fine, van Rooij, Feldman, Shalvi, Scheper, Leib, and Cauffman fine16a Fine, Adam, Benjamin van Rooij, Yuval Feldman, Shaul Shalvi, Eline Scheper, Margarita Leib, and Elizabeth Cauffman. 2016. Rule Orientation and Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Individual Acceptance of Rule Violation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law: An Official Law Review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law 22 (3): 314--329. · DOI
- Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2007. Filial Piety as a Virtue. In Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problemsḩeckcomma edited by Rebecca L. Walker and Philip J. Ivanhoeḩeckcomma 189--202. New York: Clarendon Press. · DOI
- Ivanhoe, Philip J. and Irene Bloom. 2009. Mencius. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Kim, Sungmoon. 2019. Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics: The Political Philosophy of Mencius and Xunzi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Lambsdorff, Johann Graf. 1999. ``Corruption in Empirical Research: A Review. '' Transparency International Working Paper. Berlin.
- McManus, Ryan M., Max Kleiman-Weiner, and Liane Young. 2020. What We Owe to Family: The Impact of Special Obligations on Moral Judgment. Psychological Science 31 (3): 227--242. DOI: 10.1177/0956797619900321. · DOI
- Nivison, David Shepherd. 2002. Mengzi as Philosopher of History. In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretationsḩeckcomma edited by Alan K. L. Chanḩeckcomma 282--304. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. · DOI
- Park, Hoon. 2003. Determinants of Corruption: A Cross-National Analysis. Multinational Business Review 11 (2): 29--48. DOI: 10.1108/1525383X200300010. · DOI
- Richardson, Grant. 2006. The Influence of Culture on Fiscal Corruption: Evidence across Countries Tax Law and Political Institutions. Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 24: 124--142.
- Russell, Bertrand. 1922 2020. The Problem of China. London: Routledge.
- Sarkissian, Hagop. 2010. Recent Approaches to Confucian Filial Morality. Philosophy Compass 5 (9): 725--734. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00319.x. · DOI · Paper page
- Sarkissian, Hagop. 2020. Do Filial Values Corrupt? How Can We Know? Clarifying and Assessing the Recent Confucian Debate. Dao 19 (2): 193--207. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-020-09718-z. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarkissian, H., & Buchtel, E. E.
- Affiliations
- Baruch College (US)
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- Res Philosophica
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-41
- ISSN
- 2168-9105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312190839
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Res Philosophica (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Saint Louis University
- Education University of Hong Kong
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Keywords
- Confucianism, filial piety, corruption, corruption tolerance, authoritarianism, Chinese society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review