Cited by 727Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEconomic and Fiscal StudiesIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Optimal Income Transfer Programs: Intensive versus Extensive Labor Supply Responses

Saez, E.·2002·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper investigates the optimal income transfer problem at the low end of the income distribution. The government maximizes a social welfare function and faces the traditional equity-efficiency trade-off. The paper models labor supply behavioral responses along the intensive margin (hours or intensity of work on the job) and along the extensive margin (participation in the labor force). Optimal tax formulas are derived as a function of the behavioral elasticities, the shape of the income distribution and the redistribution tastes of the government. When behavioral responses are concentrated along the intensive margin, the optimal transfer program is a classical Negative Income Tax program with a substantial guaranteed income support that is taxed away at high rates. However, when behavioral responses are concentrated along the extensive margin, the optimal transfer program is an Earned Income Credit program with negative marginal tax rates at low income levels and a small guaranteed income. Numerical simulations calibrated with the actual empirical earnings distribution are presented for a range of behavioral elasticities and redistributive tastes of the government. For realistic elasticities, the optimal program provides a moderate guaranteed income, imposes low tax rates on very low annual earnings levels, and then starts phasing out benefits at substantial rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355302760193959

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A universal basic income has labor supply distortions because there is still a tax on labor income, and adding it requires adjusting the tax schedule elsewhere.

    “3) as emphasized by Saez (2002), it is not the case that a universal basic income has no labor supply distortions, since there is still a tax on labor income, and in particular adding the universal basic income to the tax schedule requires adjusting the tax schedule elsewhere.”

    From Universal Basic Incomes versus Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries (2018) · cites this paper as Saez (2002)

    The Abstract (p. 2) describes an equity–efficiency trade-off, labor-supply responses to income transfers, and guaranteed income that is taxed away at high rates. This supports the point that transfers can involve labor-supply distortions, but the readable passages do not specifically discuss a universal basic income or say that adding one requires adjusting the tax schedule elsewhere. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A universal basic transfer can be recast as a particular feature of a tax schedule, as described by Saez (2002).

    “Given that a universal basic income would need to be financed through taxation, one can recast universal basic transfers as a particular feature of a tax schedule, as described by Saez (2002) and illustrated by Figure 1.”

    From Universal Basic Incomes versus Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries (2018) · cites this paper as Saez (2002)

    The Abstract (p. 2) describes income-transfer programs through optimal tax formulas, including a negative income tax with guaranteed income support; the figures on p. 40 are labeled transfer and tax schedules. This supports treating transfers as part of a tax schedule, but the readable passages do not specifically describe a universal basic transfer or its tax financing. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An optimal income tax schedule is likely to feature a universal basic income when intensive labor supply elasticities are larger than extensive labor supply elasticities.

    “He also discusses the conditions under which an optimal income tax schedule is likely to feature a universal basic incomeessentially, when intensive labor supply elasticities (the effects of changes in wages on hours of existing workers) are larger than extensive labor supply elasticities (the effect of changes in wages on hours of workers entering or leaving the labor force).”

    From Universal Basic Incomes versus Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries (2018) · cites this paper as Saez (2002)

    The Abstract (p. 2) says that when labor-supply responses are concentrated on the intensive margin, the optimal program is a negative income tax with substantial guaranteed income. It does not call this a universal basic income, and it says the optimum also depends on the income distribution and the government's redistributive preferences. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saez, E.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Saez, E.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
1039-1073
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2890726336
Cited by
727
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
FWCI
38.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
negative income tax, Earned Income Tax Credit, labor force participation, guaranteed income, marginal tax rates, low-income households

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review