The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade
Abstract
This paper exploits product-level U. S. import data to test trade theory. Although the United States increasingly sources the same products from both high- and low-wage countries, unit values within products vary systematically with exporter relative factor endowments and exporter production techniques. These facts reject factor-proportions specialization across products but are consistent with such specialization within products. The data are inconsistent with new trade theory models predicting an inverse relationship between price and producer productivity. The existence of within-product specialization is an important consideration for understanding the impact of globalization on firms and workers, the evolution of total factor productivity, and the likelihood of long-run income convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Plants and Productivity in International Trade
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803769206296 · Cited by 2,980
Cited by
Globalization and the Gains From Variety
Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541 · Cited by 2,478
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
BERNARD, A. B., REDDING, S. J., & SCHOTT, P. K. (2007) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00413.x · Cited by 958
Self-citationUnconditional Convergence in Manufacturing *
Rodrik, D. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs047 · Cited by 940
Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization
Hummels, D. (2007) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.3.131 · Cited by 841
Trade Adjustment: Worker-Level Evidence *
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. H., & Song, J. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju026 · Cited by 803
Metadata
- Authors
- Schott, P. K.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 647-678
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W1990320303
- Cited by
- 1,341
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 83.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/0033553041382201
- The paper
- Schott, P. K. (2004). Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.