The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Much does Sorting Increase Inequality?
Abstract
Some commentators argue that increased sorting into internally homogeneous neighborhoods, schools, and marriages is radically polarizing society. Calibration of a formal model, however, suggests that the steady-state standard deviation of education would increase only 1.7 percent if the correlation between neighbors' education doubled, and would fall only 1.6 percent if educational sorting by neighborhood disappeared. The steady-state standard deviation of education would grow 1 percent if the correlation between spouses' education increased from 0.6 to 0.8. In fact, marital and neighborhood sorting have been stable, or even decreasing historically. Sorting has somewhat more significant effects on intergenerational mobility than on inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility
Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260831 · Cited by 2,243
Cited by
Job Information Networks, Neighborhood Effects, and Inequality
Ioannides, Y. M., & Loury, L. D. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051043004595 · Cited by 1,113
Intergenerational Mobility in the Labor Market
Solon, G. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03010-2 · Cited by 1,109
Kelly, M. (2000) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465300559028 · Cited by 767
Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences
Schwartz, C. R. (2013) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544 · Cited by 688
Why Governments Should Invest More to Educate Girls
Paul Schultz, T. (2002) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00107-3 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- Kremer, M.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-139
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2144592869
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Much does Sorting Increase Inequality? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003355397555145
- The paper
- Kremer, M. (1997). How Much does Sorting Increase Inequality? The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.