Cited by 992Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityGlobal trade and economicsEducation and Labor Relations

Why Do Firms Train? Theory and Evidence

Acemoglu, D., Pischke, J.-S.·1998·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper offers a theory of training whereby workers do not pay for the general training they receive. The superior information of the current employer regarding its employees' abilities relative to other firms creates ex post monopsony power, and encourages this employer to provide and pay for training, even if these skills are general. The model can lead to multiple equlibria. In one equilibrium quits are endogenously high, and as a result employers have limited monopsony power and provide little training, while in another equilibrium quits are low and training is high. Using microdata on German apprentices, we show that the predictions of our model receive some support from the data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355398555531

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Labor economists have documented that some training investment occurs because labor market imperfections such as wage compression, information asymmetries, and monopsony power can make general training investment privately rational under certain conditions.

    “Labor economists have documented that despite this market failure, some training investment occurs because labor market imperfections (wage compression, information asymmetries, monopsony power) can make general training investment privately rational under certain conditions (Acemoglu & Pischke, 1998;Stevens, 1994).”

Authors
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J.-S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
79-119
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2100316976
Cited by
992
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 40
FWCI
42.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Labor Relations
Keywords
employee training, monopsony power, transferable skills, multiple equilibria, employee turnover, apprenticeship, human capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review