Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 812

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax

Open access
Feldstein, Martin·1999·Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

Traditional analyses of the income tax greatly underestimate deadweight losses by ignoring its effect on forms of compensation and patterns of consumption. The full deadweight loss is easily calculated using the compensated elasticity of taxable income to changes in tax rates because leisure, excludable income, and deductible consumption are a Hicksian composite good. Microeconomic estimates imply a deadweight loss of as much as 30% of revenue or more than ten times Harberger's classic 1964 estimate. The relative deadweight loss caused by increasing existing tax rates is substantially greater and may exceed $2 per $1 of revenue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003465399558391

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ballard C., 1985, American Economic Review, 77, 128
  2. Browning E., 1987, American Economic Review, 77, 11
  3. 10.1086/261994 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Feldstein M., 1995, American Economic Review, 85, 170
  5. Feldstein M., 1992, National Tax Journal, 45, 1, 10.1086/NTJ41788943 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0047-2727(87)90073-9 · DOI
  7. Stuart C., 1984, American Economic Review, 74, 352
  8. Triest R., 1992, this REVIEW, 74, 91

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Feldstein, M.
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Published
1999-11
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
674-680
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W2889716373
Cited by
812
References
0
FWCI
50.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.