The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On International and National Dimensions of Risk Sharing
Abstract
This paper contributes to the empirical literature that tests the implications of risk sharing across regions or countries. Rather than test the null of full insurance, the estimation method produces a parameter that measures the fraction of the annuity value of individual income that individuals of different regions (or nations) pool. Comparing the provinces of Canada, the states of the United States, and the G-7 countries, I find similar degrees of risk sharing within regions of Canada and the U.S. that exceed the risk sharing that occurs across countries. Specifically, more than two-thirds of the fitted annual variation in regional consumption is common to all regions compared to less than one-third in the case of G-7 countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
'New' Views on the Optimum Currency Area Theory: What is Emu Telling Us?
Mongelli, F. P. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.357400 · Cited by 354
Risk, Returns, and Multinational Production *
Fillat, J. L., & Garetto, S. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv031 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Crucini, M. J.
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-84
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9142
- OpenAlex
- W2037075819
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On International and National Dimensions of Risk Sharing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003465399767923836
- The paper
- Crucini, M. J. (1999). On International and National Dimensions of Risk Sharing. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399767923836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.