Cited by 378Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchReading and Literacy Development

The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation

Burton, Martha W., Small, Steven L., Blumstein, Sheila E.·2000·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Phonological processes map sound information onto higher levels of language processing and provide the mechanisms by which verbal information can be temporarily stored in working memory. Despite a strong convergence of data suggesting both left lateralization and distributed encoding in the anterior and posterior perisylvian language areas, the nature and brain encoding of phonological subprocesses remain ambiguous. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the conditions under which anterior (lateral frontal) areas are activated during speech-discrimination tasks that differ in segmental processing demands. In two experiments, subjects performed "same/ different" judgments on the first sound of pairs of words. In the first experiment, the speech stimuli did not require overt segmentation of the initial consonant from the rest of the word, since the "different" pairs only varied in the phonetic voicing of the initial consonant (e.g., dip-tip). In the second experiment, the speech stimuli required segmentation since "different" pairs both varied in initial consonant voicing and contained different vowels and final consonants (e.g., dip-ten). These speech conditions were compared to a tone-discrimination control condition. Behavioral data showed that subjects were highly accurate in both experiments, but revealed different patterns of reaction-time latencies between the two experiments. The imaging data indicated that whereas both speech conditions showed superior temporal activation when compared to tone discrimination, only the second experiment showed consistent evidence of frontal activity. Taken together, the results of Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that phonological processing per se does not necessarily recruit frontal areas. We postulate that frontal activation is a product of segmentation processes in speech perception, or alternatively, working memory demands required for such processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892900562309

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speech and nonspeech sounds activate the left inferior frontal cortex (pars triangularis and pars opercularis) when they need to be segmented and held in auditory working memory.

    “Beyond the temporal lobes, speech and nonspeech sounds activated the left inferior frontal cortex (pars triangularis and pars opercularis) when they needed to be segmented and held in auditory working memory (Burton et al., 2000; Pedersen et al., 2000; Hsieh et al., 2001; Poldrack et al., 2001).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 378

Authors
Burton, M. W., Small, S. L., & Blumstein, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
679-690
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2133950672
Cited by
378
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-R01-3378, R01DC003378, DC00314, R01DC000314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
phonological processing, speech segmentation, speech perception, working memory, left lateralization, frontal cortex activation, speech discrimination, voicing, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Phonetics, Pitch Discrimination, Reaction Time, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review