The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations
Abstract
Recent behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) studies have revealed cross-modal interactions in endogenous spatial attention between vision and audition, plus vision and touch. The present ERP study investigated whether these interactions reflect supramodal attentional control mechanisms, and whether similar cross-modal interactions also exist between audition and touch. Participants directed attention to the side indicated by a cue to detect infrequent auditory or tactile targets at the cued side. The relevant modality (audition or touch) was blocked. Attentional control processes were reflected in systematic ERP modulations elicited during cued shifts of attention. An anterior negativity contralateral to the cued side was followed by a contralateral positivity at posterior sites. These effects were similar whether the cue signaled which side was relevant for audition or for touch. They also resembled previously observed ERP modulations for shifts of visual attention, thus implicating supramodal mechanisms in the control of spatial attention. Following each cue, single auditory, tactile, or visual stimuli were presented at the cued or uncued side. Although stimuli in task-irrelevant modalities could be completely ignored, visual and auditory ERPs were nevertheless affected by spatial attention when touch was relevant, revealing cross-modal interactions. When audition was relevant, visual ERPs, but not tactile ERPs, were affected by spatial attention, indicating that touch can be decoupled from cross-modal attention when task-irrelevant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070 · cited 3×
“The ADAN (Nobre et al., 2000; Mangun, 1994) has been linked to the activation of frontal structures involved in the control of spatial attentional shifts within visual space (Corbetta, Miezin, Shulman, & Petersen, 1993; Posner & Petersen, 1990).”
BackgroundThe neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5 · Cited by 1,622
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.
Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1298 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Cited by
Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action
Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001392 · Cited by 614
Do deaf individuals see better?
Bavelier, D., Dye, M. W. G., & Hauser, P. C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 · Cited by 506
Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain
Macaluso, E., & Driver, J. (2005) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.03.008 · Cited by 428
Self-citationFrom Gaze Perception to Social Cognition: The Shared-Attention System
Stephenson, L. J., Edwards, S. G., & Bayliss, A. P. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620953773 · Cited by 437
Talsma, D., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929054475172 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Eimer, M., Velzen, J. V., & Driver, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-271
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2125031950
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892902317236885
- The paper
- Eimer, M., Velzen, J. V., & Driver, J. (2002). Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317236885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.