Sustained Mnemonic Response in the Human Middle Frontal Gyrus during On-Line Storage of Spatial Memoranda
Abstract
The mapping of cognitive functions to neural systems is a central goal of cognitive neuroscience. On the basis of homology with lesion and physiological studies in nonhuman primates, Brodmann's area (BA) 46/9 in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) has been proposed as the cortical focus for both the storage as well as processing components of working memory in the human brain, but the evidence on the segregation of these components and their exact areal localization has been inconsistent. In order to study this issue and increase the temporal resolution of functional mapping, we disambiguated the storage component of working memory from sensory and motor responses by employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in spatial delayed-response (DR) tasks with long delay intervals and different conditions of demand. We here show that BA 46 can support a sustained mnemonic response for as long as 24 sec in a high-demand task and the signal change in this area exceeded that in the other prefrontal areas examined. Our findings support a conservation of functional architecture between human and nonhuman primate in showing that the MFG is prominently engaged in the storage of spatial information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The delayed spatial WM task is previously validated.
“Briefly, healthy human subjects performed a previously validated delayed spatial WM task (Leung et al. 2002;Driesen et al. 2008).”
From Linking microcircuit dysfunction to cognitive impairment: Effects of disinhibition associated with schizophrenia in a cortical working memory model (2014) · cites this paper as Leung et al. 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Leung, H.-C., Gore, J. C., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Yale University
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 659-671
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2142483272
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44866, MH38546, MH30929-22, P50MH044866)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 33332, R01NS033332)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, middle frontal gyrus, Brodmann area 46, spatial working memory, memory storage, delayed response task, prefrontal cortex, functional homology, task demands
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Memory, Mental Processes, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review