The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations
Abstract
Three experiments investigated whether it is possible to orient selective spatial attention to internal representations held in working memory in a similar fashion to orienting to perceptual stimuli. In the first experiment, subjects were either cued to orient to a spatial location before a stimulus array was presented (pre-cue), cued to orient to a spatial location in working memory after the array was presented (retro-cue), or given no cueing information (neutral cue). The stimulus array consisted of four differently colored crosses, one in each quadrant. At the end of a trial, a colored cross (probe) was presented centrally, and subjects responded according to whether it had occurred in the array. There were equivalent patterns of behavioral costs and benefits of cueing for both pre-cues and retro-cues. A follow-up experiment used a peripheral probe stimulus requiring a decision about whether its color matched that of the item presented at the same location in the array. Replication of the behavioral costs and benefits of pre-cues and retro-cues in this experiment ruled out changes in response criteria as the only explanation for the effects. The third experiment used event-related potentials (ERPs) to compare the neural processes involved in orienting attention to a spatial location in an external versus an internal spatial representation. In this task, subjects responded according to whether a central probe stimulus occurred at the cued location in the array. There were both similarities and differences between ERPs to spatial cues toward a perception versus an internal spatial representation. Lateralized early posterior and later frontal negativities were observed for both preand retro-cues. Retro-cues also showed additional neural processes to be involved in orienting to an internal representation, including early effects over frontal electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 4×
“In the pre-cue condition, the finding of faster reaction times to validly cued trials, and decreased accuracy to invalid trials, relative to neutral trials replicated the well-known effects of orienting spatial attention to visual arrays (e.g., Hawkins et al., 1990; Müller & Findlay, 1987; Müller & Rabbit, 1989; Jonid…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNeural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498 · cited 2×
“…is consistent with behavioral, lesion, and imaging data that have suggested that right hemisphere regions are able to direct attention into both visual hemifields, while posterior left hemisphere regions are primarily involved in directing attention into the right hemifield (Mesulam, 1981, 1999).”
BackgroundResultKosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090055 · Cited by 1,894
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816
Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01593-x · Cited by 1,229
Cited by
Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory
Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,404
‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework
Stokes, M. G. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.004 · Cited by 850
Typologies of attentional networks
Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1903 · Cited by 706
Working memory and attention - a conceptual analysis and review
Oberauer, K. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.58 · Cited by 634
Cueing attention after the stimulus is gone can retrospectively trigger conscious perception
Sergent, C., Wyart, V., Babo-Rebelo, M., Cohen, L., Naccache, L., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.047 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1176-1194
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2038422875
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892903322598139
- The paper
- Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322598139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.