The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Neurology of Empty Categories: Aphasics' Failure to Detect Ungrammaticality
Abstract
A direct investigation into the grammatical abilities of Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics sought to obtain critical evidence for a revised model of the functional neuroanatomy of language. We examined aphasics' ability to make grammaticality judgments on a set of theoretically selected, highly complex syntactic structures that involve, most prominently, fine violations of constraints on syntactic movement. Although both groups have been thought to possess intact abilities in this domain, we discovered severe deficits: Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics (whose performances differed) exhibited clear, delineated, and grammatically characterizable deficits—they follow from the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, which is motivated by independent comprehension results. These conclusions have both linguistic and neurological implications: Linguistically, they show that the aphasic deficit interacts with more than one module of the grammar. Namely, it manifests not only when the thematic module is called for in interpretive tasks but also when constraints on syntactic movement are tapped in a study of judgment. Neurologically, the results support a view of receptive grammatical mechanisms in the left cortex, which is functionally more restrictive than currently assumed; neuroanatomically, however, it is more distributed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007 · Cited by 438
Self-citationNeural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments
Ben-Shachar, M., Palti, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.027 · Cited by 368
Self-citationMapping therapy for sentence production impairments in nonfluent aphasia
Rochon, E., Laird, L., Bose, A., & Scofield, J. (2005) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602010343000327 · Cited by 100
Sentactics®: Computer-automated treatment of underlying forms
Thompson, C. K., Choy, J. J., Holland, A., & Cole, R. (2010) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030903474255 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-292
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2165615377
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Neurology of Empty Categories: Aphasics' Failure to Detect Ungrammaticality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892998562708
- The paper
- Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L. (1998). The Neurology of Empty Categories: Aphasics' Failure to Detect Ungrammaticality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.