Cited by 169Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFace and Expression Recognition

Learning optimized features for hierarchical models of invariant object recognition.

Wersing, Heiko, Körner, Edgar·2003·Neural Computation

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate over the capabilities of hierarchical neural feedforward architectures for performing real-world invariant object recognition. Although a variety of hierarchical models exists, appropriate supervised and unsupervised learning methods are still an issue of intense research. We propose a feedforward model for recognition that shares components like weight sharing, pooling stages, and competitive nonlinearities with earlier approaches but focuses on new methods for learning optimal feature-detecting cells in intermediate stages of the hierarchical network. We show that principles of sparse coding, which were previously mostly applied to the initial feature detection stages, can also be employed to obtain optimized intermediate complex features. We suggest a new approach to optimize the learning of sparse features under the constraints of a weight-sharing or convolutional architecture that uses pooling operations to achieve gradual invariance in the feature hierarchy. The approach explicitly enforces symmetry constraints like translation invariance on the feature set. This leads to a dimension reduction in the search space of optimal features and allows determining more efficiently the basis representatives, which achieve a sparse decomposition of the input. We analyze the quality of the learned feature representation by investigating the recognition performance of the resulting hierarchical network on object and face databases. We show that a hierarchy with features learned on a single object data set can also be applied to face recognition without parameter changes and is competitive with other recent machine learning recognition approaches. To investigate the effect of the interplay between sparse coding and processing nonlinearities, we also consider alternative feedforward pooling nonlinearities such as presynaptic maximum selection and sum-of-squares integration. The comparison shows that a combination of strong competitive nonlinearities with sparse coding offers the best recognition performance in the difficult scenario of segmentation-free recognition in cluttered surround. We demonstrate that for both learning and recognition, a precise segmentation of the objects is not necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089976603321891800

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HTM model in the paper uses sparse-distributed representations when considering representations within an entire hierarchical level, but does not use sparse-distributed representations within a node.

    “The HTM model in this paper uses sparse-distributed representations [68],[69] when considering the representations within an entire hierarchical level. However, it does not use sparse-distributed representations within a node.”

    From Towards a mathematical theory of cortical micro-circuits (2009) · cites this paper as [69]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 169

Authors
Wersing, H., & Körner, E.
Affiliations
Honda (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Wersing, Heiko
  • Körner, Edgar
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1559-1588
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2166676140
Cited by
169
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
invariant object recognition, hierarchical neural model, sparse coding, representation learning, parameter sharing, pooling, translation invariance, face recognition, feature detection, dimensionality reduction, segmentation-free recognition, cluttered scenes
MeSH terms
Learning, Models, Neurological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review