Decomposition Methods for Linear Support Vector Machines
Abstract
In this letter, we show that decomposition methods with alpha seeding are extremely useful for solving a sequence of linear support vector machines (SVMs) with more data than attributes. This strategy is motivated by Keerthi and Lin (2003), who proved that for an SVM with data not linearly separable, after C is large enough, the dual solutions have the same free and bounded components. We explain why a direct use of decomposition methods for linear SVMs is sometimes very slow and then analyze why alpha seeding is much more effective for linear than nonlinear SVMs. We also conduct comparisons with other methods that are efficient for linear SVMs and demonstrate the effectiveness of alpha seeding techniques in model selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Kao, W.-C., Chung, K.-M., Sun, C.-L., & Lin, C.-J.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1689-1704
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2119573243
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- linear support vector machine, decomposition method, dual solutions, overfitting, model selection, high-dimensional data, computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review