The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Access to the Internet
Abstract
The relative costs and expertise associated with using the Internet, labeled technological and social access, have led to a concern about the rise of a “digital divide” between information haves and have-nots. To address whether and to what extent the Internet has become a medium of the masses and to identify the factors associated with social access to the Internet, I examine Internet use data from two statewide surveys, the Carolina Poll and the Indiana Poll, conducted during spring 1998. Multivariate analysis reveals that income, education, age, and family structure are important social determinants of on-line access and that Internet use is lowest among single mothers, members of lower socioeconomic groups, and older respondents. Although the online population is beginning to diversify, the Internet cannot yet claim a committed, nonelite mass audience. It is argued that the disparities in Internet use portend a looming information gap between those with access and those without.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267786 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills
Hargittai, E. (2002) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 · Cited by 1,951
“Existing studies of differential Internet access and use document inequalities among various segments of the population (Bucy 2000) with particular attention to education (NTIA 2000) race (Hoffman 1999), gender (Bimber 2000), age (Loges and Jung 2001), income (Benton 1998) and rural residence…”
BackgroundDifferences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender*
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · Cited by 734
Sleep and sleep ecology in the first 3 years: a web-based study
SADEH, A., MINDELL, J. A., LUEDTKE, K., & WIEGAND, B. (2009) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00699.x · Cited by 510
Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide
Gunkel, D. J. (2003) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144480354003 · Cited by 444
Selwyn, N. (2003) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00062-3 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucy, E. P.
- Venue
- Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-61
- ISSN
- 1081-180X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160767957
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 63.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Access to the Internet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/108118000568967
- The paper
- Bucy, E. P. (2000). Social Access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/108118000568967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.