The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
Abstract
Summary: Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) facilitates a systems view in environmental evaluation of products, materials, and processes. Life‐cycle assessment attempts to quantify environmental burdens over the entire life‐cycle of a product from raw material extraction, manufacturing, and use to ultimate disposal. However, current methods for LCA suffer from problems of subjective boundary definition, inflexibility, high cost, data confidentiality, and aggregation. This paper proposes alternative models to conduct quick, cost effective, and yet comprehensive life‐cycle assessments. The core of the analytical model consists of the 498 sector economic input‐output tables for the U.S. economy augmented with various sector‐level environmental impact vectors. The environmental impacts covered include global warming, acidification, energy use, non‐renewable ores consumption, eutrophication, conventional pollutant emissions and toxic releases to the environment. Alternative models are proposed for environmental assessment of individual products, processes, and life‐cycle stages by selective disaggregation of aggregate input‐output data or by creation of hypothetical new commodity sectors. To demonstrate the method, a case study comparing the life‐cycle environmental performance of steel and plastic automobile fuel tank systems is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema, B. P., & Pennington, D. W. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005 · Cited by 2,753
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,455
Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product
Suh, S., & Huppes, G. (2005) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001 · Cited by 710
Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review
Hawkins, T. R., Gausen, O. M., & Strømman, A. H. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Joshi, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 95-120
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W1971378878
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/108819899569449
- The paper
- Joshi, S. (1999). Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819899569449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.