The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?
Abstract
An increasingly dominant, largely American response to the contemporary environmental crisis understands environmental degradation as the product of individual shortcomings and finds solutions in enlightened, uncoordinated consumer choice. Several forces promote this process of individualization, including the historical baggage of mainstream environmentalism, the core tenets of liberalism, the dynamic ability of capitalism to commodify dissent, and the relatively recent rise of global environmental threats to human prosperity. The result is to narrow our collective ability to imagine and pursue a variety of productive responses to the environmental problems before us. When responsibility for environmental problems is individualized, there is little room to ponder institutions, the nature and exercise of political power, or ways of collectively changing the distribution of power and influence in society. Confronting consumption requires individuals to understand themselves not primarily as consumers but rather as citizens in a participatory democracy, working together to change broader policy and larger social institutions. It also requires linking explorations of consumption to politically charged issues that challenge the political imagination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change
Hargreaves, T. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540510390500 · Cited by 1,060
Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2020.13 · Cited by 649
Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans?
Dauvergne, P. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.002 · Cited by 478
Green Consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions
Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540507086422 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Maniates, M. F.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 31-52
- ISSN
- 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0091
- OpenAlex
- W2163013510
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/152638001316881395
- The paper
- Maniates, M. F. (2001). Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World? Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.