The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Hypercube-Based Encoding for Evolving Large-Scale Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Research in neuroevolution—that is, evolving artificial neural networks (ANNs) through evolutionary algorithms—is inspired by the evolution of biological brains, which can contain trillions of connections. Yet while neuroevolution has produced successful results, the scale of natural brains remains far beyond reach. This article presents a method called hypercube-based NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies (HyperNEAT) that aims to narrow this gap. HyperNEAT employs an indirect encoding called connective compositional pattern-producing networks (CPPNs) that can produce connectivity patterns with symmetries and repeating motifs by interpreting spatial patterns generated within a hypercube as connectivity patterns in a lower-dimensional space. This approach can exploit the geometry of the task by mapping its regularities onto the topology of the network, thereby shifting problem difficulty away from dimensionality to the underlying problem structure. Furthermore, connective CPPNs can represent the same connectivity pattern at any resolution, allowing ANNs to scale to new numbers of inputs and outputs without further evolution. HyperNEAT is demonstrated through visual discrimination and food-gathering tasks, including successful visual discrimination networks containing over eight million connections. The main conclusion is that the ability to explore the space of regular connectivity patterns opens up a new class of complex high-dimensional tasks to neuroevolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
The chemical basis of morphogenesis
Turing, A. M. (1952) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 · Cited by 11,733
MAPS IN THE BRAIN: What Can We Learn from Them?
Chklovskii, D. B., & Koulakov, A. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144226 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 3,974
Neural Architecture Search: A Survey
Elsken, T., Metzen, J. H., & Hutter, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.05377 · Cited by 1,763
Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence
Lu, H., Li, Y., Chen, M., Kim, H., & Serikawa, S. (2018) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-017-0932-8 · Cited by 1,153
Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learning
Salimans, T., Ho, J., Chen, X., Sidor, S., & Sutskever, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.03864 · Cited by 1,027
“Hyper-Neat Stanley et al. [2009] is an alternative approach to evolving both the weights of the neural networks and their parameters.”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, K. O., D'Ambrosio, D. B., & Gauci, J.
- Venue
- Artificial Life
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-212
- ISSN
- 1064-5462 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9185
- OpenAlex
- W2119814172
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Hypercube-Based Encoding for Evolving Large-Scale Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/artl.2009.15.2.15202
- The paper
- Stanley, K. O., D'Ambrosio, D. B., & Gauci, J. (2009). A Hypercube-Based Encoding for Evolving Large-Scale Neural Networks. Artificial Life. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl.2009.15.2.15202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.