Cited by 72Complex Systems and DynamicsEmbodied and Extended CognitionCellular Automata and Applications

Chemical basis for minimal cognition

Open access
Hanczyc, Martin M., Ikegami, Takashi·2010·Artificial Life

Abstract

We have developed a simple chemical system capable of self-movement in order to study the physicochemical origins of movement. We propose how this system may be useful in the study of minimal perception and cognition. The system consists simply of an oil droplet in an aqueous environment. A chemical reaction within the oil droplet induces an instability, the symmetry of the oil droplet breaks, and the droplet begins to move through the aqueous phase. The complement of physical phenomena that is then generated indicates the presence of feedback cycles that, as will be argued, form the basis for self-regulation, homeostasis, and perhaps an extended form of autopoiesis. We discuss the result that simple chemical systems are capable of sensory-motor coupling and possess a homeodynamic state from which cognitive processes may emerge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/artl_a_00002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive behaviour (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
  2. Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 209-243.
  3. Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Bentley, K., & Clack, C. (2004). The artificial cytoskeleton for lifetime adaptation of morphology. In J. Pollak, M. Bedau, P. Husbands, T. Ikegami, & R. A. Watson (Eds.), Workshop Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (pp. 13-16).
  5. Bottino, D., Mogilner, A., Roberts, T., Stewart, M., & Oster, G. (2002). How nematode sperm crawl. Journal of Cell Science, 115, 367-384.
  6. Brooks, R. A. (1991). New approaches to robotics. Science, 253(5025), 1227-1232.
  7. Brooks, R. A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
  8. Csaba, G. (1985). The unicellular Tetrahymena as a model cell for receptor research. International Review of Cytology, 95, 327-377.
  9. Dalous, J., Burghardt, E., Muller-Taubenberger, A., Bruckert, F., Gerisch, G., & Bretschneider, T. (2008). Reversal of cell polarity and actin-myosin cytoskeleton reorganization under mechanical and chemical stimulation. Biophysical Journal, 94, 1063-1074.
  10. Dennett, D. C. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Di Paolo, E. A. (2000). Homeostatic adaptation to inversion of the visual field and other sensorimotor disruptions. In J.-A. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. Roitblat, & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Fuster, J. (2003). Cortex and mind: Unifying cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  13. Grebe, T. W., & Stock, J. (1998). Bacterial chemotaxis: The five sensors of a bacterium. Current Biology, 8(5), R154-R157.
  14. Hanczyc, M. M., Toyota, T., Ikegami, T., Packard, N., & Sugawara, T. (2007). Chemistry at the oil-water interface: Self-propelled oil droplets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(30), 9386-9391.
  15. Hoiczyk, E., & Baumeister, W. (1998). The junctional pore complex, a prokaryotic secretion organelle, is the molecular motor underlying gliding motility in cyanobacteria. Current Biology, 8(21), 1161-1168.
  16. Horibe, N., Hanczyc, M. M., & Ikegami, T. (2009). Shape and motion dynamics in self-moving oil droplets. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobiligence. Awaji, Japan.
  17. Kelly, I., & Melhuish, C. (2001). SlugBot: A robot predator. In ECAL 2001, LNAI 2159 (pp. 519-528).
  18. Mangome, N., & Yoshikawa, K. (1996). Nonlinear oscillation and ameba-like motion in an oil/water system. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100, 19102-19105.
  19. Matsuno, H., Hanczyc, M. M., & Ikegami, T. (2007). Self-maintained movements of droplets with convection flow. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4828 LNAI (pp. 179-188).
  20. Nagai, K., Sumino, Y., Kitahata, H., & Yoshikawa, K. (2005). Mode selection in the spontaneous motion of an alcohol droplet. Physical Review E, 71, 065301.
  21. Nishimura, S. I., & Sasai, M. (2004). Inertia of chemotactic motion as an emergent property in a model of an eukaryotic cell. In J. Pollack, M. Bedau, P. Husbands, T. Ikegami, & R. A. Watson (Eds.), Artificial Life IX: Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (pp. 410-414). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. C. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Sumino, Y., Kitahata, H., Yoshikawa, K., Nagayama, M., Nomura, S.-i. M., Magome, N., & Mori, Y. (2005). Chemosensitive running droplet. Physical Review. E, 72, 041603.
  24. Suzuki, K., & Ikegami, T. (2004). Self-repairing and mobility of a simple cell. In J. Pollack (Ed.), Artificial Life IX (pp. 421-426). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Suzuki, K., & Ikegami, T. (2009). Shapes and self-movement in protocell systems. Artificial Life, 15(1), 59-70.
  26. Toyota, T., Maru, N., Hanczyc, M. M., Ikegami, T., & Sugawara, T. (2009). Self-propelled oil droplets consuming "fuel" surfactant. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131(14), 5012-5013.
  27. Toyota, T., Tsuha, H., Yamada, K., Takakura, K., Ikegami, T., & Sugawara, T. (2006). Listeria-like motion of oil droplets. Chemistry Letters, 35, 708-709.
  28. Uchida, K. S., Kitanishi-Yumura, T., & Yumura, S. (2003). Myosin II contributes to the posterior contraction and the anterior extension during the retraction phase in migrating Dictyostelium cells. Journal of Cell Science, 116, 51-60.
  29. Varela, F. G. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier.
  30. Varela, F. G. (1992). Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and perception: A workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352 (pp. 4-14). Dublin.
  31. Velarde M. G., Wilson, S. K., & Helliwell, J. R. (1998). Marangoni and interfacial phenomena in materials processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 356, 829-844.
  32. Yumura, S., & Fukui, Y. (1998). Spatiotemporal dynamics of actin concentration during cytokinesis and locomotion in Dictyostelium. Journal of Cell Science, 111, 2097-2108.
  33. Yumura, S., Mori, H., & Fukui, Y. (1984). Localization of actin and myosin for the study of ameboid movement in Dictyostelium using improved immunofluorescence. Journal of Cell Biology, 99, 894-899.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanczyc, M. M., & Ikegami, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Artificial Life
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2010-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
233-243
ISSN
  • 1064-5462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9185
OpenAlex
W2039922706
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Life (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
Keywords
self-motion, oil droplets, symmetry breaking, feedback loops, homeostasis, autopoiesis, sensory-motor coupling, emergence of cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Feedback, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Movement, Robotics, Thermodynamics, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review