CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Disability Rights and RepresentationDisability Education and EmploymentAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

In the Wake of Universal Design: Mapping the Terrain

Guffey, Elizabeth·2021·Design Issues
DOI 10.1162/desi_a_00629
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This review essay is intended as a state of the field, outlining an emerging design for disability that is inflected by thinking from Critical Disability Studies. The article notes how this thinking draws from the tradition of Universal Design and presents five keywords that characterize the newer approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/desi_a_00629

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 1 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bringolf Jane, 2008, Multi, 1, 45
  2. 10.1080/17547075.2016.1218714 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Guffey, E.
Corresponding author
Guffey, Elizabeth
ORCID
Guffey, Elizabeth
Venue
Design Issues
Publisher
MIT Press - Journals
Published
2021-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
76-82
ISSN
  • 0747-9360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4790
DOI
10.1162/desi_a_00629
OpenAlex
W3119255421
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Design Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
design for disability, universal design, critical disability studies, disability studies, accessible design, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In the Wake of Universal Design: Mapping the Terrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/desi_a_00629
The paper
Guffey, E. (2021). In the Wake of Universal Design: Mapping the Terrain. Design Issues. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00629