The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK
Abstract
In the UK a new theme has emerged in policy discourse and the investment of public resources around the concept of community renewable energy. A series of central government funded programs have been established with the aim of supporting and subsidizing community-based projects at a local level, an approach to renewable energy development previously the domain of alternative technology activists working outside of the mainstream. Drawing upon policy analysis and interviews undertaken with key actors, we argue that this new theme of government policy has emerged through a coalescence of largely instrumental policy drivers and does not represent a broader paradigmatic shift in the underlying norms and goals of policy. We consider the different ways the community label has been used and argue that while it has provided a ºexible space that activities, interests and objectives of various forms can occupy, its functional malleability also means that the communitarian expectations of participatory involvement are not being widely pursued or realized. Implications are considered for how, in the context of the governance of climate change, the outcomes of public investment in community renewable energy should be evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development
Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 · Cited by 678
Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy
van der Schoor, T., & Scholtens, B. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089 · Cited by 532
Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change
Rutherford, J., & Coutard, O. (2014) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098013500090 · Cited by 435
The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy
HUYBRECHTS, B., & MERTENS, S. (2014) · Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics · doi:10.1111/apce.12038 · Cited by 149
Community energy business model evolution: a review of solar photovoltaic developments in England
Nolden, C., Barnes, J., & Nicholls, J. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109722 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, G., Hunter, S., Devine-Wright, P., Evans, B., & Fay, H.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 64-82
- ISSN
- 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0091
- OpenAlex
- W2161194938
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64
- The paper
- Walker, G., Hunter, S., Devine-Wright, P., Evans, B., & Fay, H. (2007). Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.