The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses
Open accessAbstract
This article introduces a special issue on the expanding research agenda on institutional fragmentation. The term refers to the growing diversity and challenges to coordination among private and public norms, treaties, and organizations that address a given issue area of international politics. International relations scholars increasingly address this phenomenon, framing it with alternative concepts like regime complexes or polycentricity. A considerable part of the existing debate remains focused on whether a centralized or polycentric governance architecture is preferable. Instead, as this special issue shows, domains of global environmental governance—like climate change, biological diversity, renewable energy, and forestry—are already fragmented. It is time to address new, more pertinent questions and help advance institutionalist research on this phenomenon. We introduce four major research themes for analyzing the fragmentation of different domains of global environmental governance: taking stock, causes, consequences, and responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Consequently, governance efforts need to account for fragmentation when organizations in inter-connected areas make choices that have bearing on each other; by examining these connections and positioning any decision within a dense network of issues and entities [143].”
From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [143]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizations and Environments
Hougland, J. G., Shepard, J. M., & Aldrich, H. E. (1980) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257814 · Cited by 2,896
Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
Ostrom, E. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 · Cited by 2,460
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710004068 · Cited by 2,047
Michigan Journal of International Law
(2020) · Michigan Journal of International Law · doi:10.36642/mjil · Cited by 1,510
The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. H., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14 · Cited by 1,261
Self-citationThe Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818304582036 · Cited by 1,147
Theories of International Regimes
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P. B., & Rittberger, V. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511521720 · Cited by 1,066
The Politics of International Regime Complexity
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592709090033 · Cited by 1,058
International Institutions And State Power: Essays In International Relations Theory
Keohane, R. O. (1989) · Cited by 783
Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties
Koskenniemi, M., & Leino, P. (2002) · Leiden Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s0922156502000262 · Cited by 664
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bernstein Steven, 2007, Pauly, 161
- Guetzkow Harold, 1966, Bowers, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance
Abbott, K. W., Green, J., & Keohane, R. O. (2016) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818315000338 · Cited by 639
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108284646 · Cited by 471
The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. J. (2018) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8 · Cited by 384
Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2014) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-014-9197-1 · Cited by 325
A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance
Dorsch, M. J., & Flachsland, C. (2017) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00400 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
- Venue
- Global Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1526-3800 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0091
- OpenAlex
- W1968971240
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 53.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Environmental Politics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- institutional fragmentation, global environmental governance, polycentric governance, regime complexes, centralized governance, climate governance, biodiversity governance, renewable energy governance, forest governance, institutionalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
