The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Work of Copyright Law in the Age of Generative AI
Abstract
January 01 2024 The Work of Copyright Law in the Age of Generative AI Kate Crawford, Kate Crawford Kate Crawford is a Research Professor at USC Annenberg, a Senior Principal Researcher at MSR-NYC, and founder of the Knowing Machines Project. Her latest book, Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence (Yale University Press) won the Sally Hacker Prize (2022). Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jason Schultz Jason Schultz Jason Schultz is a Professor of Clinical Law at NYU School of Law, Director of NYU's Technology Law & Policy Clinic, and Codirector of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Kate Crawford Kate Crawford is a Research Professor at USC Annenberg, a Senior Principal Researcher at MSR-NYC, and founder of the Knowing Machines Project. Her latest book, Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence (Yale University Press) won the Sally Hacker Prize (2022). Jason Schultz Jason Schultz is a Professor of Clinical Law at NYU School of Law, Director of NYU's Technology Law & Policy Clinic, and Codirector of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy. Online ISSN: 1536-0105 Print ISSN: 1526-3819 © 2024 Kate Crawford and Jason Schultz2024Kate Crawford and Jason Schultz Grey Room (2024) (94): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/grey_a_00389 Cite Icon Cite Permissions…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This shift could significantly impact the livelihoods of artists, writers, and other creators, potentially leading to economic disparities and a devaluation of human creativity (Crawford & Schultz, 2024;Dwivedi et al., 2023).”
From Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights (2024) · cites this paper as Crawford & Schultz, 2024
In the citing paper
“the outcome of which is a profound destabilisation of copyright law (Amankwah-Amoah et al., 2024;Appel et al., 2023;Crawford & Schultz, 2024;Gans, 2024;Jodha & Bera, 2023).”
From Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights (2024) · cites this paper as Crawford & Schultz, 2024
Citations
Cited by
Al-Busaidi, A. S., Raman, R., Hughes, L., Albashrawi, M. A., Malik, T., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al- Alawi, T., AlRizeiqi, M., Davies, G., Fenwick, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100630 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, K., & Schultz, J.
- Venue
- Grey Room
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2024-01-01
- Issue
- 94
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 1526-3819
- 1536-0105
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
