The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Government as a Platform
Open accessAbstract
During the past 15 years, the World Wide Web has created remarkable new methods for harnessing the creativity of people in groups, and in the process has created powerful business models that are reshaping our economy.As the Web has undermined old media and software companies, it has demonstrated the enormous power of a new approach, often referred to as Web 2.0.In a nutshell: the secret to the success of bellwethers like Google, Amazon, eBay, Craigslist, Wikipedia, Facebook, and Twitter is that each of these sites, in its own way, has learned to harness the power of its users to add value to-no, more than that, to co-create-its offerings.Now, a new generation has come of age with the Web, and it is committed to using its lessons of creativity and collaboration to address challenges facing our country and the world.Meanwhile, with the proliferation of issues and not enough resources to address them all, many government leaders recognize the opportunities Web 2.0 technologies provide not just to help them get elected, but to help them do a better job.By analogy, many are calling this movement Government 2.0.What the heck does that mean?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Zittrain, J. L. (2008) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 1,467
The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth
Deck, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.116_1.x · Cited by 884
Government data and the invisible hand
Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W. P., & Felten, E. W. (2008) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 120
The Next Government of the United States: Why Our Institutions Fail Us and How to Fix Them
Greve, C. (2009) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030903030963 · Cited by 61
Systemantics: How Systems Work and Especially How They Fail
Gall, J. (1977) · Cited by 52
Cited by
Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030 · Cited by 604
Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0
Nam, T. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005 · Cited by 368
Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance
Barns, S. (2018) · City, Culture and Society · doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006 · Cited by 312
Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
Platform Government in the Era of Smart Technology
Kim, S., Andersen, K. N., & Lee, J. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13422 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Reilly, T.
- Venue
- Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-40
- ISSN
- 1558-2477 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2485
- OpenAlex
- W1974511341
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 178.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Government as a Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/inov_a_00056
- The paper
- O'Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.