The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spreading Temptation: Proliferation and Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreements
Open accessAbstract
Peaceful nuclear cooperation—the transfer of nuclear technology, materials, or know-how from one state to another for peaceful purposes—leads to the spread of nuclear weapons. In particular, countries that receive peaceful nuclear assistance are more likely to initiate weapons programs and successfully develop the bomb, especially when they are also faced with security threats. Statistical analysis based on a new data set of more than 2,000 bilateral civilian nuclear cooperation agreements signed from 1950 to 2000 lends strong support for this argument. Brief case studies of the Indian and Pakistani nuclear weapons programs provide further evidence of the links between peaceful nuclear assistance and proliferation. The finding that supplier countries inadvertently raise the risks of nuclear proliferation poses challenges to the conventional wisdom. Indeed, the relationship between civilian nuclear cooperation and proliferation is surprisingly broad. Even assistance that is often viewed as innocuous, such as training nuclear scientists or providing research or power reactors, increases the likelihood that nuclear weapons will spread. “Proliferation-proof” nuclear assistance does not exist. With a renaissance in nuclear power on the horizon, major suppliers, including the United States, should reconsider their willingness to assist other countries in developing peaceful nuclear programs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirically, Fuhrmann (2009) demonstrated that the number of programmes initiated is significantly higher in states under existential threat without nuclear guarantees.”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1177/0022002708330288 · DOI
- 10.2307/2539198 · DOI
- 10.2307/2539273 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002708330287 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343308094324 · DOI
- 2003, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 59, 40
- 10.1162/0162288042879959 · DOI
- 10.1162/016228805775124543 · DOI
- 10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.80 · DOI
- 10.1177/000271627743000104 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002704269655 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055409090017 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002706296158 · DOI
- 10.1080/00963402.1983.11458937 · DOI
- 10.1086/230699 · DOI
- Congress U.S., 1993, S. Government Printing Office, 115
- Greenwood Ted, 1977, McGraw-Hill, 150
- 10.1162/016228801753191132 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002782026002005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002708330289 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002708330388 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002708330387 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002708330386 · DOI
- 10.1080/00963402.1994.11456538 · DOI
- 10.1080/0305707042000254074 · DOI
- 10.2307/1148590 · DOI
- 10.1080/10736709708436661 · DOI
- Kapur Ashok, 1976, Praeger, 193
- Kapur Ashok, 1987, Croom Helm, 75
- Rehman Shahid-Ur, 1999, Print Wise, 36
- Moore Will H., 2006, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 6, 89
- 10.1080/07388940490463861 · DOI
- 10.2307/2991855 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343304041061 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2991857 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/mpi014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/00223433030405004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1536867X0300300205 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343305056225 · DOI
- Wooldridge Jeffrey M., 2000, South-Western College, 501
Cited by
Basit, A., Bano, S., & Mahar, I. A. (2026) · ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences · doi:10.63056/academia.5.3(s6).2026.2033
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuhrmann, M.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fuhrmann, Matthew
- ORCID
- Fuhrmann, Matthew
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-41
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2060985940
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 70.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- International Security (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Nuclear Issues and Defense
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Keywords
- nuclear proliferation, nuclear technology transfer, nuclear weapons program, India nuclear program, Pakistan nuclear program, security threats, nuclear power development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review