Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190Nuclear Issues and DefenseDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesInternational Relations and Foreign Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spreading Temptation: Proliferation and Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreements

Open access
Fuhrmann, Matthew·2009·International Security

Abstract

Peaceful nuclear cooperation—the transfer of nuclear technology, materials, or know-how from one state to another for peaceful purposes—leads to the spread of nuclear weapons. In particular, countries that receive peaceful nuclear assistance are more likely to initiate weapons programs and successfully develop the bomb, especially when they are also faced with security threats. Statistical analysis based on a new data set of more than 2,000 bilateral civilian nuclear cooperation agreements signed from 1950 to 2000 lends strong support for this argument. Brief case studies of the Indian and Pakistani nuclear weapons programs provide further evidence of the links between peaceful nuclear assistance and proliferation. The finding that supplier countries inadvertently raise the risks of nuclear proliferation poses challenges to the conventional wisdom. Indeed, the relationship between civilian nuclear cooperation and proliferation is surprisingly broad. Even assistance that is often viewed as innocuous, such as training nuclear scientists or providing research or power reactors, increases the likelihood that nuclear weapons will spread. “Proliferation-proof” nuclear assistance does not exist. With a renaissance in nuclear power on the horizon, major suppliers, including the United States, should reconsider their willingness to assist other countries in developing peaceful nuclear programs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/isec.2009.34.1.7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1177/0022002708330288 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/2539198 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2539273 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0022002708330287 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0022343308094324 · DOI
  6. 2003, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 59, 40
  7. 10.1162/0162288042879959 · DOI
  8. 10.1162/016228805775124543 · DOI
  9. 10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.80 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/000271627743000104 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0022002704269655 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S0003055409090017 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0022002706296158 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/00963402.1983.11458937 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/230699 · DOI
  16. Congress U.S., 1993, S. Government Printing Office, 115
  17. Greenwood Ted, 1977, McGraw-Hill, 150
  18. 10.1162/016228801753191132 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0022002782026002005 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0022002708330289 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0022002708330388 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0022002708330387 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0022002708330386 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/00963402.1994.11456538 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/0305707042000254074 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/1148590 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/10736709708436661 · DOI
  28. Kapur Ashok, 1976, Praeger, 193
  29. Kapur Ashok, 1987, Croom Helm, 75
  30. Rehman Shahid-Ur, 1999, Print Wise, 36
  31. Moore Will H., 2006, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 6, 89
  32. 10.1080/07388940490463861 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/2991855 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0022343304041061 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.2307/2991857 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/pan/mpi014 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/00223433030405004 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/1536867X0300300205 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0022343305056225 · DOI
  41. Wooldridge Jeffrey M., 2000, South-Western College, 501

Metadata

Authors
Fuhrmann, M.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Fuhrmann, Matthew
Venue
International Security
Published
2009-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
7-41
ISSN
  • 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4804
OpenAlex
W2060985940
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
70.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Security (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Nuclear Issues and Defense
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
Keywords
nuclear proliferation, nuclear technology transfer, nuclear weapons program, India nuclear program, Pakistan nuclear program, security threats, nuclear power development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review