The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Process of Social Innovation
Open accessAbstract
Every truth passes through three stages.First, it is ridiculed.Second, it is violently opposed.Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. -Arthur SchopenhauerMuch of what we now take for granted in social life began as radical innovation.A century ago, few believed that ordinary people could be trusted to drive cars at high speed, the idea of a national health service freely available was seen as absurdly utopian, the concept of "kindergarten" was still considered revolutionary, and only one country had given women the vote.Yet in the interim, these and many other social innovations have progressed from the margins to the mainstream.During some periods in recent history, civil society provided most of the impetus for social innovation (see box, facing page).The great wave of industrialization and urbanization in the nineteenth century was accompanied by an extraordinary upsurge of social enterprise and innovation: mutual self-help, microcredit, building societies, cooperatives, trade unions, reading clubs, and philanthropic business leaders creating model towns and model schools.In nineteenth and early twentieth century Britain, civil society pioneered the most influential new models of childcare, housing, community development and social care.At other times governments have taken the lead in social innovation-for example, in the years after 1945 democratic governments built welfare states, schooling systems, and institutions using methods such as credit banks for farmers and networks of adult education colleges.(This was a period when many came to see civic and charitable organizations as too parochial, paternalist, and inefficient to meet social needs on any scale.)There is every reason to believe that the pace of social innovation will, if anything, accelerate in the coming century.There is certainly more money flowing into NGOs and civil society than ever before.Economies in both developed and (to
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development
Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 · Cited by 678
Bayuo, B. B., Chaminade, C., & Göransson, B. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120030 · Cited by 197
Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports
Turker, D., & Altuntas Vural, C. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.019 · Cited by 96
Díaz-Perdomo, Y., Álvarez-González, L. I., & Sanzo-Pérez, M. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719907 · Cited by 31
Resistance to a social innovation: An analytic framework for problems of Fair Trade diffusion
Gurviez, P., & Sirieix, L. (2013) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570713487479 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulgan, G.
- Venue
- Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-162
- ISSN
- 1558-2477 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2485
- OpenAlex
- W2145998291
- Cited by
- 1,226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Process of Social Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
- The paper
- Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.