The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis
Abstract
Summary: Since 1989, efforts to understand the nature of interfirm resource sharing in the form of industrial symbiosis and to replicate in a deliberate way what was largely self‐organizing in Kalundborg, Denmark have followed many paths, some with much success and some with very little. This article provides a historical view of the motivations and means for pursuing industrial symbiosis—defined to include physical exchanges of materials, energy, water, and by‐products among diversified clusters of firms. It finds that “uncovering” existing symbioses has led to more sustainable industrial development than attempts to design and build eco‐industrial parks incorporating physical exchanges. By examining 15 proposed projects brought to national and international attention by the U.S. President's Council on Sustainable Development beginning in the early 1990s, and contrasting these with another 12 projects observed to share more elements of self‐organization, recommendations are offered to stimulate the identification and uncovering of already existing “kernels” of symbiosis. In addition, policies and practices are suggested to identify early‐stage precursors of potentially larger symbioses that can be nurtured and developed further. The article concludes that environmentally and economically desirable symbiotic exchanges are all around us and now we must shift our gaze to find and foster them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
I NDUSTRIAL S YMBIOSIS : Literature and Taxonomy
Chertow, M. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313 · Cited by 1,917 · cited 4×
“The keys to industrial symbiosis are collaboration and the synergistic possibilities offered by geographic proximity” (Chertow 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353 · Cited by 743
Escalante, J., Chen, W.-H., Tabatabaei, M., Hoang, A. T., Kwon, E. E., Andrew Lin, K.-Y., & Saravanakumar, A. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112914 · Cited by 414
de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., Faaij, A., Slade, R., Mawhood, R., & Junginger, M. (2015) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1613 · Cited by 294
Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3148 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Chertow, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-30
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2160162283
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 85.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.