Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone

van Beers, Dick, Bossilkov, Albena, Corder, Glen, van Berkel, Rene·2007·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: The realization of regional synergies in industrial areas with intensive minerals processing provides a significant avenue toward sustainable resource processing. This article provides an overview of past and current synergy developments in two of Australia's major heavy industrial regions, Kwinana (Western Australia) and Gladstone (Queensland), and includes a comparative review and assessment of the drivers, barriers, and trigger events for regional synergies initiatives in both areas. Kwinana and Gladstone compare favorably with well‐known international examples in terms of the current level and maturity of industry involvement and collaboration and the commitment to further explore regional resource synergies. Kwinana stands out with regard to the number, diversity, complexity, and maturity of existing synergies. Gladstone is remarkable with regard to unusually large geographic boundaries and high dominance of one industry sector. Many diverse regional synergy opportunities still appear to exist in both industrial regions (particularly in Kwinana), mostly in three broad areas: water, energy, and inorganic by‐product reuse. To enhance the further development of new regional synergies, the Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing (CSRP), a joint initiative of Australian minerals processing companies, research providers, and government agencies, has undertaken several collaborative projects. These include research to facilitate the process of identifying and evaluating potential synergy opportunities and assistance for the industries with feasibility studies and implementation of selected synergy projects in both regions. The article also reports on the progress to date from this CSRP research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jiec.2007.1161

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • I NDUSTRIAL S YMBIOSIS : Literature and Taxonomy

    Chertow, M. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313 · Cited by 1,917 · cited 3×

    “These concern the capture, recovery, and reuse of previously discarded by-products from one industrial operation by other, traditionally separate, industries operating in their close proximity, a process most commonly referred to as industrial symbio- sis (Chertow 2000).”
    BackgroundInfluential

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
van Beers, D., Bossilkov, A., Corder, G., & van Berkel, R.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2007-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
55-72
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2003708014
Cited by
279
References
1
FWCI
43.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jiec.2007.1161
The paper
van Beers, D., Bossilkov, A., Corder, G., & van Berkel, R. (2007). Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1161

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.