Cited by 3Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The Cortical Underpinnings of Context-based Memory Distortion

Open access
Aminoff, Elissa, Schacter, Daniel L., Bar, Moshe·2008·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Everyday contextual settings create associations that later afford generating predictions about what objects to expect in our environment. The cortical network that takes advantage of such contextual information is proposed to connect the representation of associated objects such that seeing one object (bed) will activate the visual representations of other objects sharing the same context (pillow). Given this proposal, we hypothesized that the cortical activity elicited by seeing a strong contextual object would predict the occurrence of false memories whereby one erroneously “remembers” having seen a new object that is related to a previously presented object. To test this hypothesis, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging during encoding of contextually related objects, and later tested recognition memory. New objects that were contextually related to previously presented objects were more often falsely judged as “old” compared with new objects that were contextually unrelated to old objects. This phenomenon was reflected by activity in the cortical network mediating contextual processing, which provides a better understanding of how the brain represents and processes context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2008.20156

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recruitment of parahippocampal, retrosplenial, and posterior inferior parietal cortices during encoding of contextually related items is associated with subsequent false recognition of novel related items.

    “Recruitment of parahippocampal, retrosplenial, and posterior inferior parietal cortices during encoding of items that are contextually related (e.g., bed, dresser, etc.) is associated with subsequent false recognition of novel related items (e.g., alarm clock) (48),”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bartlett FC 1932 Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  2. Brainerd CJ Reyna VF 2005 The science of false memory New York Oxford University Press
  3. Gallo DA 2006 Associative illusions of memory New York Taylor & Francis

Authors
Aminoff, E., Schacter, D. L., & Bar, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
2226-2237
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1575308159
Cited by
3
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008441-30)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG008441)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 060941, T32MH070328, R01MH060941)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS044319, NS050615, R01NS050615)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
false memory, contextual processing, recognition memory, object association, cortical networks, memory encoding
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review