Knowing Your Lines but Missing Your Cue: Rostral Prefrontal Lesions Impair Prospective Memory Cue Detection, but Not Action-intention Superiority
Abstract
Prospective memory (PM) deficits are a common consequence of lesions to PFC, but their underlying neurocognitive mechanisms and processes are poorly understood. Here, we report on a patient, Z. P., who suffers from a chronic focal PM deficit, while other cognitive functions including memory are intact. His lesion involves right polar PFC (Brodmann's areas 10 and 9). Z. P. was very impaired on tasks that require detection of PM cues during an ongoing task. He was impaired regardless of whether the PM cues involved effortful or nearly effortless detection on the part of controls. By contrast, on tasks that tap the underlying (implicit) representations of intentions to perform an action, Z. P. showed normal patterns of intention superiority effects (ISEs) for to-be-performed actions and an inhibition effect for prospective actions after they had been performed. Thus, this is the first report of a neuropsychological dissociation between preserved privileged representation of prospective intentions and impaired detection of cues that support the opportune recovery of PM. Our data are compatible with the "gateway hypothesis" of rostral PFC, but also suggest there are components that are unique to PM and that remain intact after lesions to this region.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with damage to rostral prefrontal cortex show disorganization in everyday life.
“patients with damage to this region show disorganization in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010)”
From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010
Rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life as well as in remembering intentions for just a few seconds.
“For example, rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010) as well as remembering intentions for just a few seconds (Gilbert, 2011), whereas more posterior frontal regions respond more strongly to standard working memory tasks (Reynolds, West, & Braver, 2009).”
From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010
Cites
Autobiographical and episodic memory—one and the same?
Gilboa, A. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.014 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment
Gilbert, S. J. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.972963 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“For example, rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010) as well as remembering intentions for just a few seconds (Gilbert, 2011), whereas more posterior frontal regions respond more strongly to standard…”
BackgroundDecoding the Content of Delayed Intentions
Gilbert, S. J. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5336-10.2011 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“…stored PM intentions, consistent with previous neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies indicating the involvement of this region in PM (Okuda et al., 1998; Burgess et al., 2000, 2001, 2003; Simons et al., 2006; West, 2008; Gilbert et al., 2009; Reynolds et al., 2009; Uretzky and Gilboa, 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGilboa, A., & Moscovitch, M. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.008 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Uretzky, S., & Gilboa, A.
- Affiliations
- 1National Institute for Rehabilitation of the Brain Injured, Haifa, Israel
- Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
- ORCID
- Gilboa, Asaf
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2745-2757
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2168951633
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- prospective memory, rostral prefrontal cortex, cue detection, prefrontal lesions, gateway hypothesis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Cues, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prefrontal Cortex, Intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review