Cited by 35Cognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and Influences

Knowing Your Lines but Missing Your Cue: Rostral Prefrontal Lesions Impair Prospective Memory Cue Detection, but Not Action-intention Superiority

Uretzky, Sharon, Gilboa, Asaf·2010·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) deficits are a common consequence of lesions to PFC, but their underlying neurocognitive mechanisms and processes are poorly understood. Here, we report on a patient, Z. P., who suffers from a chronic focal PM deficit, while other cognitive functions including memory are intact. His lesion involves right polar PFC (Brodmann's areas 10 and 9). Z. P. was very impaired on tasks that require detection of PM cues during an ongoing task. He was impaired regardless of whether the PM cues involved effortful or nearly effortless detection on the part of controls. By contrast, on tasks that tap the underlying (implicit) representations of intentions to perform an action, Z. P. showed normal patterns of intention superiority effects (ISEs) for to-be-performed actions and an inhibition effect for prospective actions after they had been performed. Thus, this is the first report of a neuropsychological dissociation between preserved privileged representation of prospective intentions and impaired detection of cues that support the opportune recovery of PM. Our data are compatible with the "gateway hypothesis" of rostral PFC, but also suggest there are components that are unique to PM and that remain intact after lesions to this region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2010.21419

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with damage to rostral prefrontal cortex show disorganization in everyday life.

    “patients with damage to this region show disorganization in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010)”

    From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010

  • Rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life as well as in remembering intentions for just a few seconds.

    “For example, rostral prefrontal cortex appears to play a prominent role in prospective memory in everyday life (Burgess, 2000; Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010) as well as remembering intentions for just a few seconds (Gilbert, 2011), whereas more posterior frontal regions respond more strongly to standard working memory tasks (Reynolds, West, & Braver, 2009).”

    From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Uretzky & Gilboa, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uretzky, S., & Gilboa, A.
Affiliations
  • 1National Institute for Rehabilitation of the Brain Injured, Haifa, Israel
  • Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
2745-2757
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2168951633
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
prospective memory, rostral prefrontal cortex, cue detection, prefrontal lesions, gateway hypothesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cues, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prefrontal Cortex, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review